- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
M4-Y10
- Nominated by: Commander Code-8 Hello There! 05:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: I've been a member of WP:TOR since 2012 and I'm pretty sure this is my first ever Old Republic article.
(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
- JediMasterMacaroni
(Talk) 15:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC) - VergenceScatter (talk) 20:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
UberSoldat93 
(talk) 08:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
TOR noms are the easiest. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 13:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)- LucaRoR (talk) 15:51, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Object
OOM
I think it's okay to say that the droid was on Tatooine based on that swtor.com screenshot.The source never says that it's a droid model, and each player can only have one of these, so I'd rather we treat this as an individual droid.OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 08:48, 26 June 2021 (UTC)- Both done. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 02:36, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Is "sensor" here intended to refer to the droid's photoreceptor?- Yes, is it just the body linking that needs to be changed?
- Yes, the word should be changed to photoreceptor as well.
- Done. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 01:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, the word should be changed to photoreceptor as well.
- Yes, is it just the body linking that needs to be changed?
"Planet" can't just be sourced to the Onslaught expansion.- I was trying to keep references simple, I thought it would be okay since Tatooine is listed in our Onslaught article. If that's accurate then I'm not sure what the issue would be? Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- A TOR expansion, just like the base game, is too big for a simple reference to work; {{TORcite}} (or a non-TOR source) should be used instead..
- That checks out, used another source. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 01:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- A TOR expansion, just like the base game, is too big for a simple reference to work; {{TORcite}} (or a non-TOR source) should be used instead..
- I was trying to keep references simple, I thought it would be okay since Tatooine is listed in our Onslaught article. If that's accurate then I'm not sure what the issue would be? Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
"was announced in 2021 to appear" — per the swtor.com webpage itself, the announcement was published on April 30, 2021, so that date should be mentioned.- Added. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
I think it would be more appropiate to have the title at "M4-Y10" per astromech naming convention.OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 10:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)- I think that would look nicer but I'm not sure what convention you're referring to. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- R2-D2, R4-P17, T3-M4, et al. all consist of single letters plus numbers, so going by that logic, the "Astromech Droid" part of the title here should be dropped. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 15:18, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- So I've found one source that uses the phrase R2-D2 Astromech so I'm down with the change now. Just gotta get the old redirect deleted. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 01:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Done now, thanks for changing the article's wording. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 13:46, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- So I've found one source that uses the phrase R2-D2 Astromech so I'm down with the change now. Just gotta get the old redirect deleted. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 01:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- R2-D2, R4-P17, T3-M4, et al. all consist of single letters plus numbers, so going by that logic, the "Astromech Droid" part of the title here should be dropped. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 15:18, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- I think that would look nicer but I'm not sure what convention you're referring to. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 15:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)