Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Kessel pure

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Kessel pure

  • Nominated by: Wok142 (talk) 08:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: WookieeProject Drugs
  • Date Archived: 22:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 84 words (0 introduction, 60 body, 24 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 74 words (0 introduction, 54 body, 20 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ECvote Lewisr (talk) 23:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
  2. ECvote CometSmudge (talk) 17:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
  3. ECvote —spookywillowwtalk 22:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Object

Lew
  • This comic issue should be listed, and this card as an imo Lewisr (talk) 14:59, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
  • I think including that Obi-Wan didn't buy the Kessel pure (or any of them) should be noted Lewisr (talk) 14:59, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
    • Sources added and lack of transaction noted. Wok142 (talk) 19:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
  • I think you can use Template:Substance here Lewisr (talk) 22:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
    • Okay, would I still be able to leave the image in there since it's not actually depicting Kessel pure? It doesn't seem ideal to use just a shot from that scene as an infobox image but if I do use a template then there isn't really room for an image anywhere. Wok142 (talk) 02:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
      • You could include a caption in it in the same way Vernestra Rwoh's family group does for example, if that works with you? Lewisr (talk) 03:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
        • Honestly I'm thinking it works cleanest without an image in this case. Also, any ideas on something to put for Uses or Properties for the infobox? Wok142 (talk) 07:23, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
          • Fair enough, thought I'd say incase you wanted to add it in there. I guess you don't need to add anything for use if there's as of yet no confirmed use (see Doaki spice for example), for properties I'd say it would be better to leave blank since we don't know much about it to add, what do you think? Lewisr (talk) 19:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
            • Blank it is. Wok142 (talk) 22:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 22:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)