Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Junker systems

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Junker systems
    • 1.1 (2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Erebus
        • 1.1.2.2 Imp
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Junker systems

  • Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 08:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:NOVELS

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 22:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:29, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
  3. — Samonic ChissAscendancyCanonSymbol 09:41, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
  4. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 13:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 12:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Object

Erebus
  • From my perspective, I would just use the {{System}} template, since we're currently treating them similarly to the Lexas systems, even though that's not a status article.
    • The system template has an orbits field for planets. This isn't a single system, so I can't use that. Besides, the Lexas systems doesn't even use an infobox. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 08:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
      • Not really an issue to me, since you can put everything in the |other= field. There are also star cluster status articles that use this template.
        • Other objects is a bit weird for a planet, but if it removes the appearances of sector battles… changed. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 11:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Since it being in the galaxy is a given no matter what, would you be able to word it differently? Erebus Chronus (Talk) 00:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
    • There's no redundancy in linking it, in my opinion. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 08:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
      • Per massive precedent, mentioning it's in the galaxy is redundant since it's a given. It was removed from one of my nominations because it's not needed. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 16:19, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
        • I see. Removed. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 11:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Imp
  • "The mission concluded with Squadron Four rendezvousing aboard the cruiser-carrier Allegiance behind Jarbanov's moon, which escaped into hyperspace" — dangling participle, reads like the moon escaped into hyperspace.
  • It would be beneficial to note where the Aerie was collecting the wreckage from. Imperators II(Talk) 11:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Both addressed. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 12:20, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
  • "the Aerie also escaped the system thereafter" — given that rogue planets (=planets not located in star systems) are a thing in Star Wars, we shouldn't be assuming that celestial bodies are located inside systems unless a source actually says that. Imperators II(Talk) 09:02, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Shadow Fall establishes that Jarbanov is in the "inner system" of whatever system it's located in, while also being in the outskirts of the junker systems. I should have reflected that better in the article. How does it all look now? Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 11:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Comments

  • Wasn't sure how to handle a group of systems without using a sector infobox. Do object if you feel strongly about it. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 08:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 12:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)