- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Junker systems
- Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 08:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
- WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:NOVELS
(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
- ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 22:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:29, 19 April 2022 (UTC)- — Samonic
09:41, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Erebus Chronus (Talk) 13:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Imperators II(Talk) 12:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Object
Erebus
From my perspective, I would just use the {{System}} template, since we're currently treating them similarly to the Lexas systems, even though that's not a status article.- The system template has an orbits field for planets. This isn't a single system, so I can't use that. Besides, the Lexas systems doesn't even use an infobox. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 08:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- Not really an issue to me, since you can put everything in the |other= field. There are also star cluster status articles that use this template.
- Other objects is a bit weird for a planet, but if it removes the appearances of sector battles… changed. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 11:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- Not really an issue to me, since you can put everything in the |other= field. There are also star cluster status articles that use this template.
- The system template has an orbits field for planets. This isn't a single system, so I can't use that. Besides, the Lexas systems doesn't even use an infobox. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 08:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Since it being in the galaxy is a given no matter what, would you be able to word it differently?Erebus Chronus (Talk) 00:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)- There's no redundancy in linking it, in my opinion. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 08:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- Per massive precedent, mentioning it's in the galaxy is redundant since it's a given. It was removed from one of my nominations because it's not needed. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 16:19, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- I see. Removed. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 11:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- Per massive precedent, mentioning it's in the galaxy is redundant since it's a given. It was removed from one of my nominations because it's not needed. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 16:19, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- There's no redundancy in linking it, in my opinion. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 08:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Imp
"The mission concluded with Squadron Four rendezvousing aboard the cruiser-carrier Allegiance behind Jarbanov's moon, which escaped into hyperspace" — dangling participle, reads like the moon escaped into hyperspace.It would be beneficial to note where the Aerie was collecting the wreckage from.Imperators II(Talk) 11:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)- Both addressed. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 12:20, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
"the Aerie also escaped the system thereafter" — given that rogue planets (=planets not located in star systems) are a thing in Star Wars, we shouldn't be assuming that celestial bodies are located inside systems unless a source actually says that.Imperators II(Talk) 09:02, 19 April 2022 (UTC)- Shadow Fall establishes that Jarbanov is in the "inner system" of whatever system it's located in, while also being in the outskirts of the junker systems. I should have reflected that better in the article. How does it all look now? Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 11:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Comments
- Wasn't sure how to handle a group of systems without using a sector infobox. Do object if you feel strongly about it. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 08:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 12:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)