Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Internal Activities Committee

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Internal Activities Committee
    • 1.1 (3 ECs/3 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Macaroni
        • 1.1.2.2 UberSoldat
        • 1.1.2.3 SE
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Internal Activities Committee

  • Nominated by: --Vitus InfinitusTalk 20:00, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(3 ECs/3 Users/6 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 04:09, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
  2. ECvote UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 07:34, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
  3. ECvote OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 22:23, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
  4. The Senate being able to charge individuals with crimes seems like a terrible idea. VergenceScatter (talk) 01:07, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
  5. Liverpool92Ackbar HS 23:17, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
  6. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni
  • Ref two shouldn't need to have a note—since everything stated there is mentioned in the body, you can just source it to Galactic Atlas. JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH(Talk) 22:00, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
    • Fixed --Vitus InfinitusTalk 01:00, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
UberSoldat
  • Have you investigated Cloak of Deception to confirm whether the subject actually appears or is only mentioned? UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 11:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
    • I'll look into that. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 18:29, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
      • It does indeed have multiple appearances in Cloak of Deception, not just a mention. Supreme Emperor (talk) 00:05, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
        • Oh sweet, thank you so much SE! :) --Vitus InfinitusTalk 00:08, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
          • No prob! Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
SE
  • Can you reword the first sentence a bit? It reads a bit wonky as is, almost as if the Senate were part of the Judiciary Committee, rather than the Internal Activities Committee. Otherwise looks good, nice work. Supreme Emperor (talk) 00:10, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Reworded --Vitus InfinitusTalk 00:49, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 04:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC)