Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Ib-Dunn

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Ib-Dunn

  • Nominated by: Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:36, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:Another for Project Novels, also for the Hutt Barnburner

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:44, May 10, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 12:11, May 11, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 09:28, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
  4. - Princess GLG 21:56, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:24, May 16, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. Ayrehead
  • Could you mention the author of the encyclopaedia?
  • How do you want me to word this one as the encyclopedia has 7 authors.
  • I always go with just Sansweet and Hidalgo as I think the others are listed as "with help from" or something. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:40, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
  • Done and done.
  • I think the first sentence might be missing some punctuation.
  • Split the sentence, is this better?
  • Can you mention Ogomoor's race? Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:47, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
  • Mentioned. Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:53, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
  1. 501st
    • Just a little thing: in the infobox, you give the Hutt's full name, while the body doesn't have the full name for the introduction of the Hutt. You should be consistent, and use just name "version" for the introducing.
      • Like this?
    • You might want to add context on the Separatist Crisis. 501st dogma(talk) 20:25, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
      • Done. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:17, May 10, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Princess
    • I'm not really sure that it matters, but in the infobox you link blue and green to Color (blue-green) while in the body of the article you link just blue to Color (blue-green). It might be better if you were consistent. - Princess GLG 12:15, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
  • Done. Supreme Emperor (talk) 21:16, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • This article is short enough that it doesn't require an intro right? Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:36, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
    • Yup it only requires an intro if it's over 200 words and this is way below that. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:47, May 9, 2013 (UTC)