- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Groonor
- Nominated by: Fan26 (Talk) 05:29, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
- WookieeProject (optional): WP:TOR
(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
- LucaRoR
(Talk) 15:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC) - Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 16:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- VergenceScatter (talk) 00:34, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 04:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
OOM 224 22:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Object
Luca
The date ref says "around 3643 BBY" while the body "by 3643 BBY," which is correct?LucaRoR
(Talk) 07:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- I've always been of the opinion that we use those interchangably to denote an approximate date. Fan26 (Talk) 15:16, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- While I agree the "by" part is reasonable, I still think you should just say "by around [date]" as around can also mean after said date, making "by" redundant. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 15:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- I've always been of the opinion that we use those interchangably to denote an approximate date. Fan26 (Talk) 15:16, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 22:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)