Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Go-zeki

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Go-zeki
    • 1.1 (2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Manoof
        • 1.1.2.2 Macaroni
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Go-zeki

  • Nominated by: RogueWhistler (talk) 16:25, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Loqiical (talk) 02:46, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
  2. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 09:42, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
  3. Samonic Signatureicon (Talk) 14:09, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
  4. ECvote well done!! Manoof (he/him/his) RainbowRebellion2 01:16, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
  5. ECvote JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 02:40, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Object

Manoof
  • Hi and welcome to the nomination page! I'll call out a couple objections here so you're aware, but they will otherwise be a "sofixit"—something I'd just tidy myself in my review like this :) Firstly, the links can be removed from the quote attribution as we link them in the body. Links are only needed in quote attributions if not used in the article proper. Manoof (he/him/his) RainbowRebellion2 10:37, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
    • Done. RogueWhistler (talk) 17:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
  • "amphibicanoids" does not appear to be a real word and needs an article Manoof (he/him/his) RainbowRebellion2 10:37, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
    • "Amphibicanoid" is only ever used as a synonym for Frog-dog/Legends, so I'm not sure how I'd write up an article that isn't redundant to that one. Would it be better to just use a different word? RogueWhistler (talk) 17:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
      • Hmmm I do think it should get a different article, it doesn't seem clear to me to be a synonym and looks and sounds more like a class or type of creature, albeit with only one known species... Manoof (he/him/his) RainbowRebellion2 15:55, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
        • It's not much, but I've made the article. RogueWhistler (talk) 18:29, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
  • Asking because I'm unfamiliar with the source, but does it identify that Nar Shaddaa is a moon, the moon of Nal Hutta, and that Nal Hutta is a planet? If not those details will need to be sourced to something else. Manoof (he/him/his) RainbowRebellion2 10:37, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
    • It says that Nar Shaddaa is a moon, that Nar Shaddaa orbits Nal Hutta, and that Nal Hutta is a planet. RogueWhistler (talk) 17:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
  • For articles with only one source or one appearance, we don't tend to say "first mentioned/appeared" in the BTS, since there isn't a "second" mention/appearance. Great work overall! Manoof (he/him/his) RainbowRebellion2 10:37, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
    • I just dropped the word "first," does that work? RogueWhistler (talk) 17:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
      • Perfect! Manoof (he/him/his) RainbowRebellion2 15:55, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Macaroni
  • Based on the TFN article it seems to me that the novella and story were published on Pena's website, not SW.com - if that's true, can you please reword the bts? If not, and the novella and story were published directly on SW.com, you'll want to implement {{SW}} along with its int parameter. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 05:34, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
    • Done, the legal indicia tripped me up. RogueWhistler (talk) 17:27, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
  • I'm a little confused - was the Rakaan mind tricked by Kenobi? If so, I think it would make more sense to say "a Rakaan who had been mind tricked" JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 17:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
    • How does it look now? RogueWhistler (talk) 22:30, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments

  • In terms of "species" in the membership ritual, does it refer to everyone's skin being burned or just the new individual's skin being burned? Loqiical (talk) 04:55, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
    • It's just said that the burns came from the initiation, it's not specified whether all or just the initiate are burned. RogueWhistler (talk) 05:48, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 02:40, 16 December 2022 (UTC)