Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Gatalentan tea/Legends

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations | Gatalentan tea
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Gatalentan tea/Legends

  • Nominated by: DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:28, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Legends stealing from Canon :P --Lewisr (talk) 00:32, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Nice work. Fan26 (Talk) 02:55, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
  3. —spookywillowwtalk 21:38, August 10, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:14, August 14, 2019 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 22:24, August 16, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Fan
  • I haven't made it to Jedi Under Siege myself yet and it's been a while since I've watched any 5.10 walkthroughs, but does it actually clarify the tea as being consumable by humans? Fan26 (Talk) 02:47, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
    • Oops my bad. Removed--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:52, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
      • Actually, I've reviewed everything and found that at the end of Jedi Under Siege, Lockin sends you a mail informing you that he wishes to have some Gatalentan tea. I don't know if that's enough to add back Humans--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:06, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
        • It should definitely be mentioned in the article, and for now, I'd say yeah, that might be enough to say Humans can drink it too. Fan26 (Talk) 16:14, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
          • Added again along an explanation of how to get the letter in the BTS--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:15, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
  • Also, you need to specify the genre and publisher in the BtS. Fan26 (Talk) 16:14, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
    • Mentioned--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:15, August 6, 2019 (UTC)
      • There's a general precedent of writing out the genre name fully as opposed to going with the MMORPG acronym. Fan26 (Talk) 13:27, August 7, 2019 (UTC)
      • Also, TOR's original release year should be added. Fan26 (Talk) 13:38, August 7, 2019 (UTC)
        • Changed and added the release year.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 19:47, August 7, 2019 (UTC)
          • Same as with Gatlenta, an extra reference for the release date, publisher, etc. isn't needed. Fan26 (Talk) 17:30, August 8, 2019 (UTC)
Anil
  • I think Tea can be added to the "type" field of the infobox.
  • Could you please give a brief in-universe time frame for the tea's appearance in the game?
  • I think I'd like to see Star Wars: The Old Republic: Knights of the Eternal Throne linked somewhere in the BTS as it's only mentioned in the Sources and Notes and references.
  • Also, instead of just mentioning it as "the player," you can briefly explain that the Alliance Commander is the player character. That way, you can get rid of that linking in the quote attribution. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:39, August 14, 2019 (UTC)
  • One last nitpick: Could you please reword the bit about Daeruun to imply that "he was told it can only truly be appreciated when shared." The current wording kinda suggests that it was the General's own opinion. Also, briefly mentioning that he favored the tea would be fair, I think. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 15:29, August 14, 2019 (UTC)
Imp
  • "General Ardinondu Dipolus Daeruun of the Galactic Republic who favored the tea mentioned that he had been told" — I'm confused. In the BTS, you're saying Daeruun only mentions the tea if certain roleplaying assumptions are being made. In the article's body, this should be enclosed in some sort of RPG tags, then. Imperators II(Talk) 14:38, August 16, 2019 (UTC)
    • Like that?--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 18:56, August 16, 2019 (UTC)
      • That's what I had in mind, but I made a slight change that I believe renders the tags unnecessary. Imperators II(Talk) 19:58, August 16, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 22:24, August 16, 2019 (UTC)