- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Force Command Two
- Nominated by: Commander Code-8 Hello There! 03:18, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Because nobody said I couldn't
(4 ECs/1 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
Fan26 (Talk) 19:30, 8 June 2021 (UTC)- Supreme Emperor Holocomm 23:24, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 16:38, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Braha'tok enthusiast (Hello there) 08:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
UberSoldat93 (talk) 06:25, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Object
Braha
I imagine there's a justification for this given there's 3 EC votes, but why does the BtS make the theft the subject before bringing up the article subject?Braha'tok enthusiast (Hello there) 21:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)- Because the fact that the Naboo stole it was mentioned in the strategy guide first, which I took as an indirect mention. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 02:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Presumably, I'd go with "It was first mentioned, albeit indirectly" but I'll trust your judgement here. Braha'tok enthusiast (Hello there) 08:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Because the fact that the Naboo stole it was mentioned in the strategy guide first, which I took as an indirect mention. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 02:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
UberSoldat
Per objection here, I don't think the BTS quote is necessary.UberSoldat93 (talk) 12:10, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- I think it's useful in this instance. Since the content is only identified in aurebesh text, it saves the reader the trouble of having to translate the text themselves to see how it was identified. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 06:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Context for OOM-14.UberSoldat93 (talk) 12:12, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Done. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 06:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 06:25, 11 June 2021 (UTC)