- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Ers'ikaro
- Nominated by: — Samonic
07:56, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
- WookieeProject (optional): Novels, Chiss
(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
- Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 14:01, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 23:22, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 02:26, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Commander Code-8 Hello There! 07:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
OOM 224 12:57, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Object
Braha
Is Ers'ikaro the flag officer? I think that should be introduced in the prior sentence.The first appearance should be mentioned in the BtS too.Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 10:08, 21 April 2022 (UTC)- Both taken care of. Thank you.— Samonic
10:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Both taken care of. Thank you.— Samonic
Chiss Ascendancy is infobox exclusive.Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 17:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)- Done.— Samonic
11:58, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Done.— Samonic
ThrawnChiss
Firewolf man-of-war should not be italicized. -ThrawnChiss7 (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Fan
The crisis should be dated.Fan26 (Talk) 21:44, 24 April 2022 (UTC)- Done.— Samonic
07:26, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
- Done.— Samonic
Manoof
Since there are various types of vehicle in star wars, can you specify the Bellicose is a starship? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)- Done.— Samonic
09:08, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Done.— Samonic
Slight nit-pick and apologies as I don't have the source, but is it possible that Ers'ikaro was not one of the five admirals mentioned in Thrawn, that he had retired or been demoted or something compared to Lesser Evil? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
CC-8
Given that the Chiss Ascendancy crisis is conjecturally titled, please find an alternate way to describe the conflict without using its article title directly.Commander Code-8 Hello There! 13:44, 6 May 2022 (UTC)- Done. I was not aware that it was conjectural, nice to know.— Samonic
08:30, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Done. I was not aware that it was conjectural, nice to know.— Samonic
Verdict would be a neater word to use instead of decision, but without having the book to confirm I want to see if that's accurate firstCommander Code-8 Hello There! 13:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)- Decision is used in the source instead of verdict.— Samonic
08:30, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Decision is used in the source instead of verdict.— Samonic
I'm not sure how the decision to exile Thrawn was made subsequently to him being set to be exiled. As in the first sentence of that paragraph reads that the decision had already been made but the word "subsequently" slightly contradicts thatCommander Code-8 Hello There! 07:10, 11 May 2022 (UTC)- Done.— Samonic
07:13, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Done.— Samonic
OOM
If an individual merely held the role of commander and did not necessarily hold the rank of commander, then you should pipelink commanding officer (the role) instead.That date ref is too long. Pipelink it instead with wording like "X occurs in Y date per the reasoning [[Template:LesserEvilDate|here]].""Ers'ikaro was present" — present where?Avoid parantheses in article prose. Mitth'raw'nuruodo "Thrawn" will do.OOM 224 11:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)- Done.— Samonic
12:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Done.— Samonic
Comments
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 12:57, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Vote to strike objection (EC only)
Despite reminders, the user has failed to strike the objection after supporting for more than a week. UberSoldat93 (talk) 04:17, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Ayrehead02 (talk) 04:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Supreme Emperor Holocomm 04:34, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 05:37, 30 April 2022 (UTC)