Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Elissiar

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Elissiar

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 19:49, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:N

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. LucaRoR Sigil of House Serenno (Talk) 20:19, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
  2. ECvote OOM 224 15:30, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:13, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
  4. ECvote UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 11:56, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Object

Manoof
  • Category:Politicians can surely be added Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 03:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Should mention that Elissiar didn't recieve the position and Valorum became Chancellor Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 03:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Valorum did become Chancellor eventually, but didn't get it this run. Part of why it's omitted is that it's not known who won this election cycle in 40 BBY; sometime prior to 32 BBY, Skor Kalpana is the next individual known to have gotten it, and Valorum ends up working for Kalpana at some point and then getting the Chancellery himself later. Though, there's an 8 year gap where the title isn't known to be held by someone specific, so Elissiar could've very well won or lost. If necessary, I could specify that Valorum later got Chancellor in a different election, but given the brief context of Elissiar's mention, it seemed irrelevant, as Jinn's thoughts don't tie them together particularly much.—spookywillowwtalk 05:32, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
      • Ah thanks, didn't realise there was that delay. I think it's fine then, as you say we don't know who won Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:13, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Should mention the audiobook in the BTS if its a simultaneous mention Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 03:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
    • In a case like this, I think it goes against precedent for the canon novel SAs I've seen/done; including a lot from this book. Not too sure should add honestly.—spookywillowwtalk 05:32, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
      • Asked on Discord and response is that we shouldn't. Not ENTIRELY convinced though so gonna think on it and potentially raise an SH lol Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:13, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 11:56, 28 March 2022 (UTC)