Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Eben Figueiredo

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Eben Figueiredo

• Nominated by: —spookywilloww^talk 17:09, June 28, 2018 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: ;)

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

1. Great work! --Jedi Lover/Riverdale Chauffeur ^{(Wanna Discuss Something?)} 03:20, July 11, 2018 (UTC)
2. Imperators II^(Talk) 17:27, July 18, 2018 (UTC)
3. Tommy Macaroni 17:43, July 18, 2018 (UTC)
4. Corellian Premier^{The Force will be with you always} 16:02, July 23, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy

• Why have you sourced the headings in the table? I think you would just ref the end of each row, like this.
  • I altered it to resemble that, because it definitely makes more sense, but for as to why - I was originally replicating how this was ;) —spookywilloww^talk 13:29, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
    • Ah I see. As both are FAs it shouldn't matter, but I personally think the current way is more logical and reader friendly. Tommy Macaroni 14:35, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
• Your mudtrooper links are for Legends. Tommy Macaroni 09:53, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
  • Fixed —spookywilloww^talk 13:29, June 30, 2018 (UTC)

Real-life Imperators

• Why do you only selectively reference some of the table rows? Imperators II^(Talk) 19:19, July 5, 2018 (UTC)
  • That was per Tommy's earlier objection of comparing it to this, in which only the last listing was referenced. Different featured articles seem to have it different ways, but this was one of them —spookywilloww^talk 19:24, July 5, 2018 (UTC)
    • Ugh, please no. If you look closer at that article's table, it also references the lines selectively, probably because the article's author wanted to do a single ref per each source. I'd like you to make it clear and easy on the readers and just ref every line. Imperators II^(Talk) 19:46, July 5, 2018 (UTC)
      • Ah alright, fixed. —spookywilloww^talk 20:03, July 5, 2018 (UTC)
• Ref 1 should have some sort of indication of how the subject's birth year of 1996 was arrived at, especially given the only date visible in the accompanying screenshot is 2011. Imperators II^(Talk) 16:11, July 12, 2018 (UTC)
  • Added a written note, I hope it's clearer now —spookywilloww^talk 22:40, July 12, 2018 (UTC)

Riverdale

• The film, Daphne, appears to have a Wikipedia article to link to. --Jedi Lover/Riverdale Chauffeur ^{(Wanna Discuss Something?)} 03:07, July 11, 2018 (UTC)
  • Fixed —spookywilloww^talk 03:19, July 11, 2018 (UTC)
    • Good job! --Jedi Lover/Riverdale Chauffeur ^{(Wanna Discuss Something?)} 03:20, July 11, 2018 (UTC)

Comments