- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Devil's Asteroid
- Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 18:48, January 24, 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: "Devil's Asteroid" sounds like something from a '60s Star Trek comic.
(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
- AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:39, January 24, 2018 (UTC)
- <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 02:18, February 3, 2018 (UTC)
Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:42, February 3, 2018 (UTC)- JangFett (Talk) 23:55, February 8, 2018 (UTC)
- 1358 (Talk) 23:40, February 15, 2018 (UTC)
Object
Comments
- Would its inclusion in the Online Companion at all canonize Devil's Asteroid? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:29, January 24, 2018 (UTC)
- No, only the Devil's Asteroid system. Here's a relevant example. Imperators II(Talk) 19:37, January 24, 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for that; I know some non-canon worlds got systems in the EAOC, and have been wondering how to write them. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:39, January 24, 2018 (UTC)
- I've been convinced that, in fact, we should be treating systems as being named after prominent objects they contain. The article has been updated accordingly. Imperators II(Talk) 22:04, February 5, 2018 (UTC)
- Seems like solid enough reasoning to me. I've been wondering about stuff like this myself in relation to subjects like Zircon or Nibiru, and I think this is the best path to take. In the second paragraph, I might note that we can reason that Devil's Asteroid exists in the Legends continuity based on the provided info, which currently isn't made entierly clear. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:17, February 5, 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've reworded it per your suggestion. Imperators II(Talk) 22:54, February 5, 2018 (UTC)
- Seems like solid enough reasoning to me. I've been wondering about stuff like this myself in relation to subjects like Zircon or Nibiru, and I think this is the best path to take. In the second paragraph, I might note that we can reason that Devil's Asteroid exists in the Legends continuity based on the provided info, which currently isn't made entierly clear. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:17, February 5, 2018 (UTC)
- I've been convinced that, in fact, we should be treating systems as being named after prominent objects they contain. The article has been updated accordingly. Imperators II(Talk) 22:04, February 5, 2018 (UTC)