- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Davin (stormtrooper)
(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
Probably intended to be Davin Felth, but what can you do?--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 13:04, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed. Clone Commander Lee Talk 13:51, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Per EJ. It will probably be confirmed later, but nothing we can do now.--Cal Jedi
(Personal Comm Channel) 21:24, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
1358 (Talk) 18:50, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
Object
Is there any reasoning for not using the Twitter citation template in the Sources section?1358 (Talk) 16:56, November 28, 2011 (UTC)- Because if we did that, then there would be no links to our page on the twitter account. Its use in refs is for specificity. NaruHina Talk
17:01, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I understand. However, would you be opposed to add an extra parameter for including the Wook page, or modifying the template to not include the external link at all if a Wookieepedia page is given? Similar to {{SW}}, iirc. 1358 (Talk) 17:04, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
- I don't really see the point of going to any trouble over it. This isn't like the Databank or SW.com stuff: this was a one-time promotion. If there were a series of these then I'd probably say go ahead, but as it sits I think we should just leave it like any other source. Nonetheless, if you really want to use the Twitter template, we could just link the parenthetical TK329 to the page instead of creating a field for it. NaruHina Talk
17:11, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
- I don't really see the point of going to any trouble over it. This isn't like the Databank or SW.com stuff: this was a one-time promotion. If there were a series of these then I'd probably say go ahead, but as it sits I think we should just leave it like any other source. Nonetheless, if you really want to use the Twitter template, we could just link the parenthetical TK329 to the page instead of creating a field for it. NaruHina Talk
- Ok, I understand. However, would you be opposed to add an extra parameter for including the Wook page, or modifying the template to not include the external link at all if a Wookieepedia page is given? Similar to {{SW}}, iirc. 1358 (Talk) 17:04, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Because if we did that, then there would be no links to our page on the twitter account. Its use in refs is for specificity. NaruHina Talk
Comments