Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Dalus Othona

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Dalus Othona

  • Nominated by: Tinwe(comlink) 11:24, August 17, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: His/her/its title is a CA already, why should he/she/it settle for anything less?

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. 501st dogma(talk) 12:55, August 17, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Pah! Knew I forgot something. Toga! Toga! Toga! NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 09:22, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 20:15, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 14:00, August 19, 2012 (UTC)
  5. ECvote --Eyrezer (talk) 11:30, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

Object

  1. Since you've sourced everything else, could you source the body? Otherwise, it looks fine. 501st dogma(talk) 11:40, August 17, 2012 (UTC)
    • Gah. How careless of me. :P Done. Tinwe(comlink) 12:19, August 17, 2012 (UTC)
  2. I believe that the article should count as only a mention of Othona. The BTS should then be changed to reflect this.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 02:44, August 19, 2012 (UTC)
    • Hmm, I seem to remember that we decided to treat the HoloNet News articles as appearances, since they are in-universe, but I can't find a CT or the like to back it up... Anyway, I've changed it, at least for now; it can always be changed back if need be. Tinwe(comlink) 07:06, August 19, 2012 (UTC)
      • After looking at some status articles I believe that it should count as an appearance. I changed it back.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 14:00, August 19, 2012 (UTC)
  3. In the BTS section, I don't think you should put "First and only appearance". That's assuming it will never appear again out of thin air. Just "First appearance" will do the trick. (And sorry as I've noticed that you already have enough votes for the promotion, just wanted to clear this out). Winterz (talk) 13:24, August 20, 2012 (UTC)
    • No need to apologize. If you read the first BTS sentence closely, you'll see that it says "first and only appearance…so far," and thus does not preclude the possibility of future appearances. While I see no pressing reasons to change the wording, you are welcome to do so if you're bothered about it—I don't mind. :) Tinwe(comlink) 14:58, August 20, 2012 (UTC)
      • I guess it's not needed then.. ;) Winterz (talk) 15:43, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments