Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Crynoid

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Crynoid
    • 1.1 (3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Samonic
        • 1.1.2.2 UberSoldat
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Crynoid

  • Nominated by: Manoof (he/him/his) RainbowRebellion2 13:47, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A spider that mostly ate mosses <3 little cutie
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Samonic Signatureicon (Talk) 23:26, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
  2. ECvote JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 23:55, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
  3. Fan26 (Talk) 17:53, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Assuming Shay's objection will be addressed.—spookywillowwtalk 18:49, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
  5. ECvote UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 13:18, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Object

Samonic
  • The article, which is in the Category:Omnivorous creatures category, currently states that the crynoids mostly ate moss. Shouldn't the article be in Category:Herbivorous creatures if we don't know if crynoids ate something that wasn't plants?
    • Its neither specifically nor explicitly stated what else they ate, but there are sufficient inferences to indicate that it isn't a solely vegetarian diet Manoof (he/him/his) RainbowRebellion2 23:09, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
  • Are you mentioning the crynoid's sentience in the second paragraph for a specific reason? If not, it should probably be mentioned in the first sentence(s) of the article. Samonic Signatureicon (Talk) 15:56, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
    • To mix things up, we don't need to have each article the same and establishing its sentience earlier doesn't impact the initial information Manoof (he/him/his) RainbowRebellion2 23:09, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
      • Articles shouldn't be the same, yes, but this kind of information seems important enough to be mentioned in the first sentences. Anyway, it's just personal preference, so struck. Samonic Signatureicon (Talk) 23:19, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
UberSoldat
  • Per policy, infobox image should accommodate the infobox's full width. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 11:38, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
    • "Images smaller than the default infobox size should not be scaled up.", a larger image to meet the size requirement would reduce resolution due to scaling, many other articles have small infoboxes too Manoof (he/him/his) RainbowRebellion2 15:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
      • No need to scale. Is a wider crop of the original image possible? UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 15:49, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
        • Handled via Discord. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 13:18, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 13:18, 10 January 2023 (UTC)