Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Couronne sector/Legends

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Couronne sector

  • Nominated by: Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:41, June 22, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I was hoping this would make GAN, but that's how things go in the accursed Expansion Region

(4 ECs/3 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. Fan26 (Talk) 12:58, June 22, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:54, June 23, 2019 (UTC)
  3. Zed42 (talk) 01:16, June 23, 2019 (UTC)
  4. --Lewisr (talk) 02:03, June 23, 2019 (UTC)
  5. ECvote MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 02:00, June 26, 2019 (UTC)
  6. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:19, June 26, 2019 (UTC)
  7. ECvote Nice. Imperators II(Talk) 20:09, June 26, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Zed
  • "Passing through the northern reaches of the Couronne sector, the Great Kashyyyk Branch hyperlane[3] linked Couronne with the Umbara system in the Ghost Nebula…" Just checking, is the second instance of "Couronne" meant to be referring to the entire sector? If so, the two uses of the name in the same sentence seems off. Zed42 (talk) 20:08, June 22, 2019 (UTC)
    • It is indeed meant to refer to the sector, but I disagree that there's anything wrong with the wording. In fact, it matches the in-universe nomenclature for sectors. Take Shelsha sector from Allegiance, for example. The sector is regularly referred to as just "Shelsha"; examples: "You want us to hide on Shelsha's capital?" (chapter 3, referring to Shelkonwa, the sector capital); "I thought the reason we pulled the Teardrop listening post out was because the Alliance didn't have much of anything going on in Shelsha." (chapter 4); "Shelsha is pretty low on everyone's priority list." (chapter 8). As far as possible wording changes, I don't think the alternatives read any better. Changing it to "Couronne sector" just makes it read redundant, since "Couronne sector" is already used in that same sentence. And personally I think "Couronne" reads more effectively than just "the sector." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:59, June 23, 2019 (UTC)
"Imp" is also both a planet and a sector
  • Per the precedent with Torch Nebula, I believe we should list the Online Companion and the Expansion Region sectors map as separate Sources items. Imperators II(Talk) 11:12, June 26, 2019 (UTC)
  • Also, have you considered noting in the article that the sector borders were as described in the year 0 ABY? All three sector maps are dated to that date. Imperators II(Talk) 11:23, June 26, 2019 (UTC)

Comments