Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Coruscant Cooler

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Coruscant Cooler

  • Nominated by: Immi Thrax (talk) 01:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Who would've guessed I'd nominate another drink?

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH(Talk) 16:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
  2. ECvote OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 18:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
  3. Removed a duplicate link but the rest is great. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:10, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 23:33, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
  5. VergenceScatter (talk) 23:37, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Object

OOM
  • There's a little too much context for Coruscant. I think you can simply remove the parts about its location and affiliation since they're not really relevant to the subject.
  • Per WP:LG, the Bts here only needs to mention the subject's 1stm and 1st appearance in Legends and the source's date, media type, and authors. The bit about mixing wine with fruit juice can stay though. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 22:58, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
  • One last thing: Legends links can be added to the bts. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 15:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Macaroni
  • BTS says the website was D23, yet it is sourced to a {{DPB}} link. JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH(Talk) 15:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
    • Thank you for catching that! Wires crossed between that and different things that were on D23 first. Immi Thrax (talk) 16:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Imp
  • Is there a reason why the garnish is not described in article's body? The Bloody Rancor GA does it.
    • It's only there for a prop photo, not part of how the drink is actually served--unlike the Bloody Rancor that comes with the bone. The drink is served up in a... well, a boring plastic cup, not very elegant. —Immi Thrax (talk) 21:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
      • I don't really see how that matters. You're using that image to represent an in-universe subject in an in-universe setting. Since that image presents details that pertain to the in-universe subject, you should note them in the article's body.
  • It seems to me that per the BTS, the first Sources item merits a {{1stm}}.
    • Done! I honestly wasn't sure if we were considered Disney social media as 1st mentions, even though we're considering them sources of canon info re: SW:GE. —Immi Thrax (talk) 21:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
  • I'm going to have to disagree with OOM's comment about the Legends beverage description details. The place for that kind of detail is simply the Legends article. We now have GA precedent for not noting even significant differences between Canon and Legends subjects in any one of those articles, let alone seemingly non-contradictory details such as these. Imperators II(Talk) 10:58, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
    • There's precedent for other food and beverage status articles to have such information, for instance: Lothal Spicebrew (CA). —Immi Thrax (talk) 21:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
      • There seems to be a misunderstanding here. I'm referring to this article noting in the BTS that the Legends counterpart "mixed wine with fruit juice", which I'm arguing is unnecessary here. The article you've linked has no such information. Imperators II(Talk) 21:42, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
        • Thank you for clarifying. Although the Legends article does have that information, I see how it's not especially relevant and removed it. —Immi Thrax (talk) 23:20, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Also, I've checked Galactic Atlas, and it can be used to reference the same information that's currently sourced to Ultimate Star Wars, thereby reducing the amount of references by one. Imperators II(Talk) 11:00, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
    • Thank you so much, I don't have that book myself! —Immi Thrax (talk) 21:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Just a heads up, I'll be handling any further objections for this nomination. MasterFredCommerce Guild(talk) 04:54, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Yoinking it back, but after clinking glasses with you. —Immi Thrax (talk) 21:04, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 23:39, 2 April 2021 (UTC)