Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Conquest of Drezzi

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Conquest of Drezzi

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Clone Commander Lee Talk 11:12, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
  2. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 23:01, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 15:28, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
  4. —NAYAYEN is back! 20:45, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Good job. Imperators II(Talk) 20:57, January 16, 2012 (UTC)

Object

  1. NaruHina
  2. Lee
    • A conquest was carried out by the Sith Empire on the planet Drezzi[1] prior to the Great Galactic War,[2] a galaxy-wide war fought between the Galactic Republic and the resurgent Sith Empire that began in the year 3681 BBY. "A conquest was carried out" sounds meh to me. Can you change this.
      • Fixed.
    • Please tell us that the Queen and her children were spared.
      • It was already there.
    • Good work. Clone Commander Lee Talk 11:51, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Exiled Jedi
    • It seems to me that you could place something in the other side of the combatants box. Something like "Unidentified opposing force (Drezzi)" would probably work. If this is okay, I think you should probably find some place for it in the body of the article.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 17:14, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
      • Yeah, I was thinking about that when I nominated it. Sounds like a good idea, so added.
    • I think that you should mention the holoprojection that the Queen gave as a gift, since it was a result of the battle.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 17:16, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
      • Added to the body. I didn't add it to the infobox since I don't think it was actually an outcome of the battle, per se.—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 23:59, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Imp
    • As with your GAN, you need to provide a specific reference from TOR using the {{TORCite}} template. --Imperialles 03:48, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Imperators II
    • Umm, why do you use the date 3681 BBY considering it has nothing to do with the events of the novel? The article should be more precise and indicate that the conquest was carried out sometime before 3954 BBY, the date in which Sechel told Scourge about the conquest. (Since there is no way the conquest could have happened after that date) (Same applies to your Ressa's husband GAN) Imperators II(Talk) 18:16, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
    • In the note on the date, you should explain how the date 3954 BBY is derived, since the date is not openly mentioned in the novel. And it also should be explained how do you know the conquest took place prior to 3954 BBY (for example, because it was mentioned in the past tense or something like that). Imperators II(Talk) 10:57, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Just one; Ressa's husband could probably be added as a casualty in the infobox. —NAYAYEN is back! 13:41, January 16, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  1. While it is linguistically correct, "conquest" is indeed a noun, could you state the opening sentence differently? "A conquest was carried out..." sounds wierd. I'd suggest saying "...Drezzi was conquered..." NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 06:52, January 2, 2012 (UTC)