- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Cloud City chief engineer
- Nominated by: Darth Morrt 13:58, November 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Another SWM nom. Verrrry minor character.
(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
Looks verrrry nice. ~ SavageBob 06:03, November 30, 2010 (UTC)- Menkooroo 04:33, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Hanzo Hasashi 12:29, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
- NaruHina Talk
18:52, February 6, 2011 (UTC) - Grunny (talk) 04:29, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
Object
This article does not need to be called "Unidentified." Graestan(Talk) 23:11, December 1, 2010 (UTC)- I was assuming that Bossk was impersonating an actual chief engineer rather than simply calling himself by that title. In other words, if Bossk is trying to pass himself off as Bob Jenkins, chief engineer, the "unidentified" seems appropriate. However, if he's simply trying to pass himself off as any ol' chief engineer, I agree, this article should be renamed. ~ SavageBob 23:57, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- This article describes the actual person, not his job/title. From the scenario: "Bossk sabotaged some vital equipment, then hacked into the city's computer and sent an urgent message to Lando under the guise of the city's Chief Engineer." Darth Morrt 01:22, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- There weren't more than two in canon so far, so what is the point of the Unidentified? Graestan(Talk) 17:55, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
- If this had more votes and was ready to be archived except my objection, I'd be a little more likely to exercise lenience, but I really don't see the point of calling him "Unidentified" when the category on the CA page can handle it well enough. Graestan(Talk) 18:00, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
- I prefer to call 'Unidentified' what is unidentifed, but I've moved it to Cloud City chief engineer. Darth Morrt 00:21, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
- If this had more votes and was ready to be archived except my objection, I'd be a little more likely to exercise lenience, but I really don't see the point of calling him "Unidentified" when the category on the CA page can handle it well enough. Graestan(Talk) 18:00, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
- There weren't more than two in canon so far, so what is the point of the Unidentified? Graestan(Talk) 17:55, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
- This article describes the actual person, not his job/title. From the scenario: "Bossk sabotaged some vital equipment, then hacked into the city's computer and sent an urgent message to Lando under the guise of the city's Chief Engineer." Darth Morrt 01:22, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- I was assuming that Bossk was impersonating an actual chief engineer rather than simply calling himself by that title. In other words, if Bossk is trying to pass himself off as Bob Jenkins, chief engineer, the "unidentified" seems appropriate. However, if he's simply trying to pass himself off as any ol' chief engineer, I agree, this article should be renamed. ~ SavageBob 23:57, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
The opening sentence of the article probably shouldn't be sourced to what is currently reference [1]. "In 1 ABY" should, yeah, but the opening sentence should be sourced to Sore Loser's Revenge.- Does the chief engineer actually appear in Sore Loser's Revenge? The article makes it seem like he doesn't. If it's just Bossk impersonating him, then (Mentioned only) would be correct.
- Remember to link to Rebellion era in the infobox, not just Rebellion.
The article seems to have quite a bit of extraneous info. It reads more like an article about Ambush in Cloud City than it does an article about the Chief Engineer. Is there anything you can trim? Aaaand is the sentence in "Behind the scenes" about the alternate non-canon ending relevant to the Chief Engineer?Menkooroo 03:25, January 3, 2011 (UTC)- All is addressed. Darth Morrt 03:53, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Excellent!
One more, though: Since reference [1] is specifically about the date, shouldn't a new reference that just references Lando Calrissian: Idiot's Array be used for the final "Calrissian survived" sentence?Menkooroo 04:09, January 3, 2011 (UTC)- Done. Darth Morrt 04:16, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Excellent!
- All is addressed. Darth Morrt 03:53, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
- Graestan, could you please elaborate on your objection? ~ SavageBob 16:22, December 27, 2010 (UTC)