Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Ch'hodos's red sun

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Ch'hodos's red sun

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 13:44, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: It just happened.

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Go WP:AST Stake black msg 13:49, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Fe Nite (talk) 15:43, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 21:47, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Winterz (talk) 15:33, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:42, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. Isn't this conjecture? Fe Nite (talk) 13:56, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
    • Nope, it's identified as "Ch'hodos's red sun" in the source. Imperators II(Talk) 13:59, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
      • That still means it's conjectural, though. It's not a proper name. Stake black msg 14:01, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
        • I respectfully disagree. How can we know that the star was not referred in-universe as "Ch'hodos's red sun"? Imperators II(Talk) 14:05, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
          • This sort of thing can happen with lightsaber articles, since they would obviously be called "Anakin Skywalker's lightsaber" etc. in-universe, but I'm not really sure if the same applies to planets. Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 08:19, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
            • I don't know the official policy on this; but, if the source specifically calls it "Ch'hodos's red sun" then that is good enough for me. If it turns out to be conjecture then just put a conjecture template up there. Fe Nite (talk) 15:43, April 5, 2013 (UTC) Revised by Fe Nite at 15:43, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
  2. "The red star was orbited by the planet of Ch'hodos.[2] By the time of the renewed warfare between the Galactic Republic and the resurgent Sith Empire[2]..." You don't need to ref to ref 2 twice in a row here. 501st dogma(talk) 20:23, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks, good catch. Fixed. Imperators II(Talk) 20:29, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Comments