Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Cave-mold

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Cave-mold
    • 1.1 (4 ECs/1 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Fan
        • 1.1.2.2 UberSoldat
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Cave-mold

  • Nominated by: VergenceScatter (talk) 03:57, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(4 ECs/1 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 04:11, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  2. ECvote OOM 224 17:25, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  3. ECvote JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 17:30, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  4. LucaRoR CIS roundel (Talk) 04:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
  5. ECvote UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 09:41, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Object

Fan
  • If the Legends edition first introduced cave-mold, then there should be a legends article. There's currently not one, and as that would be linked to this page, the canon article, that counts as a redlink. Fan26 (Talk) 04:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Created. VergenceScatter (talk) 04:05, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
UberSoldat
  • Per Luca's comment below, since we always discuss the canon appearance first, you can just specify that the book reprints Legends material. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 08:45, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
    • How's that? VergenceScatter (talk) 00:26, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments

  • I've elected to use a plant infobox for this article, although in real life molds are fungi and it's never stated what taxonomic group these belong to. Additionally, the page is in Category:Creatures of unspecified biology not because I am claiming that the molds are creatures, but simply because we have no category for "species of unspecified biology." VergenceScatter (talk) 03:57, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Not an objection, so I'll write it in the comments. In the BTS, wouldn't it be better to talk about Legends after Canon since the article is Canon? LucaRoR CIS roundel (Talk) 13:44, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 09:41, 21 September 2021 (UTC)