Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Carnelian dragon

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Carnelian dragon

  • Nominated by: —Vuvalan ChissAscendancyCanonSymbol talk 01:18, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 05:11, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 211 words (0 introduction, 153 body, 58 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 205 words (0 introduction, 148 body, 57 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Comics

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. ECvote Lewisr (talk) 23:23, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
  2. ThePedantry (talk) 06:45, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
  3. StarWarsFan327Talk 15:51, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  4. Booply (talk) 17:00, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
  5. ECvote —spookywillowwtalk 17:22, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Lew
  • Just to clarify, the comic does outright call them a species and uses non-sentient? Lewisr (talk) 22:30, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
    • The article calls them "creatures," but I don't think the comic does. I will change the sourcing for that. As for sentience, they are called "beasts" in the comic, so I assumed that would mean non-sentient, but I will change it if that is not correct.—Vuvalan ChissAscendancyCanonSymbol talk 17:00, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
      • We typically need a source to refer to them as a species before we actually put it, and the same is true for non-sentient. So in this instance I'd recommend both be changed to be in line with how other creatures are treated Lewisr (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
        • Okay, makes sense! I have updated the article.—Vuvalan ChissAscendancyCanonSymbol talk 00:39, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Is there a relevant quote that could be added? Lewisr (talk) 22:30, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
    • Eh, not really. Obi-Wan addresses Grecker about the world not being truly dead when he sees the dragons, and there is a quote from Sera to Obi-Wan saying Grecker was trying to "leave him for the beasts," but there isn't a single quote that addresses the dragons directly.—Vuvalan ChissAscendancyCanonSymbol talk 17:00, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
      • No worries! Just wanted to see if there was a line that directly addressed them Lewisr (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
  • You should probably include that that the article was posted in the same year, so something like 'The dragons were named in an article published on StarWars.com on September 29 of the same year.' I would also remove the mention of SW.com being the official site, it's not really needed here Lewisr (talk) 22:30, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
  • It seems the eye and skin color are only mentioned in the infobox Lewisr (talk) 20:07, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Pedantry
  • I'd like to see the BTS also note the comic's Colorist, Andres Mossa (since by definition they contributed to the dragons design). ThePedantry (talk) 02:20, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
    • Standard is to just note the illustrator for the time being. And is a bit of a larger conversation than this nomination to change the precedent Lewisr (talk) 04:21, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 21:49, 3 December 2025 (UTC)