- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
CC-9G
- Nominated by:
Winterz (talk) 04:14, February 4, 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Rusty as hell, but lay it on me.
(4 ECs/1 Users/5 Total)
Support
Zed42 (talk) 06:31, February 5, 2020 (UTC)- UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:35, February 5, 2020 (UTC)
Nice work, hope you nominate more! Fan26 (Talk) 00:51, February 10, 2020 (UTC)
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 16:58, February 10, 2020 (UTC)
—spookywillowwtalk 18:11, February 10, 2020 (UTC)
Object
Zed
The opening sentence shouldn't be dated to the date reference.Is there a reason why the infobox/body use "feminine personality" rather than "feminine programming" as per other droid articles?I'm not entirely familiar with the usage of Jedipedia as a source, but current (and somewhat recent) CA Gorv Mespit includes that information in the BTS rather than in the article body. Additionally, the Jedipedia link should be formatted as seen there, including backup link.Zed42 (talk) 11:30, February 4, 2020 (UTC)- All done.
Winterz (talk) 16:07, February 4, 2020 (UTC)
- Can the sensor and plating color be sourced to the game? The blue color is somewhat visible in the hologram, but the droid's plating color is not really that clear. Zed42 (talk) 19:00, February 4, 2020 (UTC)
- Right you are! Done.
Winterz (talk) 19:08, February 4, 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I probably should've been clearer. If CC-9G's plating color can only be sourced to Jedipedia, it should remain solely in the BTS, and thus be removed from the infobox and body. Zed42 (talk) 19:24, February 4, 2020 (UTC)
- I don't agree Zed. The game files serve merely as visual backup. The droid (and used droid model) is of such coloring in-game, hologram or not. It's all a perspective from eyesight. One could argue that you can its metallic black even through the hologram's frame. If you want, I can source it back to the game.
Winterz (talk) 19:29, February 4, 2020 (UTC)
- Jedipedia's nature as an unofficial site means it cannot be used as a source of in-universe information, though its inclusion in the BTS is fine. As for the color, at least from looking at the article's image, the color cannot definitely be stated to be black, as it could be gray or another dark shade. Perhaps use something more general such as "dark colored plating" and then keep the mention of its color in the BTS as it is currently. Zed42 (talk) 20:30, February 4, 2020 (UTC)
- I don't agree Zed. The game files serve merely as visual backup. The droid (and used droid model) is of such coloring in-game, hologram or not. It's all a perspective from eyesight. One could argue that you can its metallic black even through the hologram's frame. If you want, I can source it back to the game.
- Sorry, I probably should've been clearer. If CC-9G's plating color can only be sourced to Jedipedia, it should remain solely in the BTS, and thus be removed from the infobox and body. Zed42 (talk) 19:24, February 4, 2020 (UTC)
- Right you are! Done.
- Can the sensor and plating color be sourced to the game? The blue color is somewhat visible in the hologram, but the droid's plating color is not really that clear. Zed42 (talk) 19:00, February 4, 2020 (UTC)
- All done.
Fan
In the second and third sentences, I think some work can be done with the pronouns. The article doesn't need another full "Chancellor Leontyne Saresh" so close to the first one. I'd also suggest swapping "Saresh" in the third sentence for something else, but I'll leave that up to you.- Done.
I'm guessing the player experiences the cutscene while on Keylander station, as such the article should probably say that the heroes received the holocall while there.- It was actually aboard each's ship. Changed.
The date note needs a little expansion to explain that since the conversation with CC-9G occurs during RotHC, it can be dated to 3639.- Honestly, I don't see a point. This is set in Rise of the Hutt Cartel. The references and appearances make that explicit. And the date ref already explains well why this is set in 3639 BBY. Adding what you ask would just be overexplaining.
- Right now, the date ref note just gives the reasoning for why RotHC can be placed in that year. It needs an extra bit explaining that since 9G shows up during the expansion or something like that, the convo w/ her can be placed in 3639 BBY. It's standard practice to elaborate on date refs like this. Fan26 (Talk) 22:36, February 9, 2020 (UTC)
- Honestly, I don't see a point. This is set in Rise of the Hutt Cartel. The references and appearances make that explicit. And the date ref already explains well why this is set in 3639 BBY. Adding what you ask would just be overexplaining.
TORcite missions go by planet, even if part of the mission takes place on that world's orbital station (e.g. the GA Ferav has Ord Mantell in TORcite even though the specific part of the mission where Ferav is encountered in the station). I'm guessing "Trouble in Paradise" is the first mission of the Makeb story arc and doesn't conclude once the conversation finishes, but rather continues onto the surface of the planet (Jedipedia's mission page is less than clear). If that's true, Makeb should be used as the location in TORcite instead of Keylander.Fan26 (Talk) 00:18, February 9, 2020 (UTC)Based on my experience with these "Go-Between droids" in TOR who appear before the person who actually wants to speak with the player appears, CC-96 probably tells the 'heroes' that Chancellor Saresh wants to talk with them. If that's true, a quote should be added.Fan26 (Talk) 00:33, February 9, 2020 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 18:11, February 10, 2020 (UTC)