Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Brangus Glee's species/Legends (third nomination)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Brangus Glee's species

• Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:56, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:

(4 ECs/0 Users/4 Total)

Support

1. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 15:57, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
2. Corellian Premier^{The Force will be with you always} 23:38, March 27, 2020 (UTC)
3. —spookywilloww^talk 23:42, March 28, 2020 (UTC)
4. Zed42 (talk) 01:12, March 29, 2020 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa

• Revise referencing for page-number rule. Also, I'd like to check on what exactly Star Wars: Chronicles says about this species to confirm its sentience. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 13:59, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
  • Both addressed. I think that with Chronicles the image itself of "Alien 23" in that pose was what made me think that Brangus's sentience could be cited to that alone. Changed the sentience citation to CCG. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 14:24, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
    • Does Chronicles give any text for this species besides "Alien 23"? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 14:40, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
      • Nope, only the quote about the resemblance to The Thinker. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 14:48, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
        • Addendum: Also no IU info for any of those maquettes. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 14:49, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
          • Then I would change any Chronicles reference to CCG, except for BTS stuff. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 14:50, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
            • Same thing apply to everything from Chronicles too? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 14:56, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
              • I'm to understand Chronicles is all behind-the-scenes information, so I wouldn't apply any of that to IU if there is an alternative IU source to reference things to. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 14:58, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
                • Done. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:00, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
• The CCG card describes this species as "dextrous" (apparent misspelling of dexterous), which isn't detailed in this article. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 15:05, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
  • Done. Also both dextrous and dexterous are grammatically correct spellings, but dexterous is more common. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:10, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
    • As for the text of Brangus being a pilot, I remember I had thought that the card stats about "anything he pilots" was only OOU stats, but I discussed with Menkooro and he thought differently. Is Menkooro correct about that being IU info, or was I initially correct about it not being IU at all, in which case not belonging in the article? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:18, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
      • I would not attempt to translate game stats into IU data. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 15:20, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
• Are you married to the "insectoid" designation? Because I would probably just ditch that description if none of the sources actually use it. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 15:20, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
  • Done and also removed IU pilot mention. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:23, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
• Reviewing note: I revised the article to cut down on some detail that I think is unnecessary for the species article. We don't need to include every biographical detail for Brangus Glee.
• There really isn't room for that BTS image, unfortunately. It doesn't look good where it is, dropped below the infobox and basically just filling the Sources section. I would recommend removing it. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 15:41, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
  • Done. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:53, March 25, 2020 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 01:12, March 29, 2020 (UTC)