- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Blaster (clone trooper)
- Nominated by: Stake black msg 07:34, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
- Date Archived: 05:13, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Final word count: 129 words (0 introduction, 83 body, 46 behind the scenes)
- Word count at nomination time: 122 words (0 introduction, 76 body, 46 behind the scenes)
- WookieeProject (optional):
(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support votes
- Commander Code-8 Hello There! 23:30, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- StarWarsFan327 (talk) 11:39, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
—spookywillowwtalk 19:50, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
CometSmudge (talk) 22:37, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Lewisr (talk) 05:13, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Objections
CC-8
Gender has different sources in the infobox and article body- Skin colour is missing from body
Year of release is missing from BTSCommander Code-8 Hello There! 06:52, 8 July 2025 (UTC)- Fixed. Thanks. Stake black msg 16:21, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
spookly
Looks like human is infobox-exclusive."Blaster was a male" is sourced to the Databank, but Blaster themselves doesn't seem to be mentioned in that entry. Did you instead intend to leave a different reference in after the name and only source the gender part of the sentence to the Databank?—spookywillowwtalk 16:30, 8 July 2025 (UTC)- Tweaked it. Stake black msg 16:51, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Seems like this is in two hidden maintenance categories, Category:WebCite usages without work parameter and Category:Series, story arcs or collections listed in Legends Appearances (this one you may need to sort out with Cade so that it doesn't re-flag). Would recommend turning on the setting to be able to see hidden maintenance categories in Preferences if you haven't already, to spot future ones.—spookywillowwtalk 19:30, 10 July 2025 (UTC)- Circled back to this, actually, and my research showed that a) doesn't need a citation template so I've shifted it off the Series page to General, and b) the Squeeze Meez were actually released in fall 2011, according to their website. See the updated citation on Star Wars Squeeze Meez for evidence and formatting for the citation. Cade
Calrayn 19:37, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- Done, thanks for checking! Stake black msg 00:16, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
- Circled back to this, actually, and my research showed that a) doesn't need a citation template so I've shifted it off the Series page to General, and b) the Squeeze Meez were actually released in fall 2011, according to their website. See the updated citation on Star Wars Squeeze Meez for evidence and formatting for the citation. Cade
Comments
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 05:13, 12 July 2025 (UTC)