- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Battle of Khorm
- Nominated by: QuiGonJinn
(Talk) 07:02, December 2, 2019 (UTC) - Nomination comments: 147 words, not counting Bts material. No longer eligible for Good status, per the rule adopted at EC Meeting 61.
(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
Fan26 (Talk) 19:45, December 2, 2019 (UTC)- Zed42 (talk) 03:17, December 5, 2019 (UTC)
-
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 15:09, December 12, 2019 (UTC) - Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:13, December 12, 2019 (UTC)
Object
Anil
The article shouldn't have an intro per CAN rule #13. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:59, December 11, 2019 (UTC)
- Either the rule is worded poorly or my understanding of it has been wrong this entire time. Rule #13 says that the article may not have an introduction if it's less than 165 words, not that it shouldn't. Based on that wording, I always thought that it was up to the nominator whether to include an intro or not, in such instances. Is that not the case? QuiGonJinn (Talk) 06:18, December 11, 2019 (UTC)
- I mean, I thought the whole point of the recent AC/EC votes was to standardize article subsectioning. Articles with less that 165 words in the body, meaning they don't have an intro and subsectioning per rule 13, are eligible for CA no matter what. Even if they have a long BTS section. This was the exact proposal that was ratified at the last EC meeting, and this flow chart was used to to illustrate the subsectioning rule when it was proposed in the respective body meetings in the first place. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:01, December 12, 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, intro removed. QuiGonJinn (Talk) 06:30, December 12, 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, intro removed. QuiGonJinn
- I mean, I thought the whole point of the recent AC/EC votes was to standardize article subsectioning. Articles with less that 165 words in the body, meaning they don't have an intro and subsectioning per rule 13, are eligible for CA no matter what. Even if they have a long BTS section. This was the exact proposal that was ratified at the last EC meeting, and this flow chart was used to to illustrate the subsectioning rule when it was proposed in the respective body meetings in the first place.
- Either the rule is worded poorly or my understanding of it has been wrong this entire time. Rule #13 says that the article may not have an introduction if it's less than 165 words, not that it shouldn't. Based on that wording, I always thought that it was up to the nominator whether to include an intro or not, in such instances. Is that not the case? QuiGonJinn
Comments
- Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 15:21, December 12, 2019 (UTC)