Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Babs Tarr

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Babs Tarr

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 02:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 00:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 116 words (0 introduction, 116 body, 0 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 111 words (0 introduction, 111 body, 0 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:CREATORSWP:PRIDEWP:COMICSWP:WOMEN

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. NanoLuukeCloning Facility 07:52, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Lewisr (talk) 20:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Wok142 (talk) 16:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
  4. CometSmudge (talk) 17:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
  5. Booply (talk) 23:58, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Object

NanoLuuke
Wok
  • Should the article title be her full name? And if not, should Babs be used before Barbara in the article? Wok142 (talk) 06:31, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
    • No; see Cherriielle for an example though it is also site policy; article titles reflect the most recent (or in a one-source case, only) name that an individual was credited as for their SW work since it's what will be searched for (with the exception of deadnames).—spookywillowwtalk 12:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Comments

  • Not listing this as an objection, but more of a general headscratcher, I've spotted a bunch of commercial links (Amazon, Simon and Schuster, goodreads, Dark Horse, Penguin, and also DC, Image and Urban comics). We tend to link social media no matters the relation to SW, but for commercial platforms, I guess you did wanted to includes anything not related to SW, which I would agree, if only for the cluter of link it would add to the pages. Maybe worth to update the ext links policy to stipulate that? Wdyt? NanoLuukeCloning Facility 12:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Hm; curiously don't mind, actually. Though, I do think the limit of such should be publishers that we already have templates for (as the company had worked on SW at some point assumingly); so added those sands DC, Image, and Urban.—spookywillowwtalk 04:29, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
  • What do you think about listing her linktr.ee in external links too? I could craft a template quickly if you wish. NanoLuukeCloning Facility 12:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Hmm; it's not something I'm personally game for, though may find a wider discussion intriguing if others disagree. My main reasoning is that we always link to authors' official sites when possible of course, and their socials, so it's easily findable there, plus we can avoid the often-for-profit links included in those.—spookywillowwtalk 04:29, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 00:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)