Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Avidich/Legends

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Avidich

Nominated by: MasterFred^(Whatever) 15:49, September 28, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

--Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 14:31, September 29, 2011 (UTC)
They export werewolves. Canon. NaruHina ^Talk 18:57, September 29, 2011 (UTC)
—Axinal ^{Convocation Chamber} 00:07, September 30, 2011 (UTC)
Menkooroo 04:31, October 5, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Axinal
- ~~I have only a few minor problems. First, the fact that Avidich was part of the Avidich system should be mentioned in the prose.~~
  - Fixed.
- ~~Perhaps add some context to "Vagaari Corridor" in the prose.~~
  - Fixed
- I feel that the exports should be consistent between the prose and the infobox, meaning either that the infobox should be specified to say lichens, or that the prose should include the word "foodstuffs" somewhere.
  - Infobox switched to "lichens."
- Is it fair to say that the planet was merely "mentioned" if there is an image (as you said below there is)? If so, I suggest the wording in the BTS be changed; if not, a {{Mo}} template would be needed in the Sources section.
  - Reworded.
- Otherwise, very nice work.—Axinal ^{Convocation Chamber} 19:04, September 28, 2011 (UTC)
  - Thanks for the review! MasterFred^(Whatever) 15:52, September 29, 2011 (UTC)
Cal Jedi
- ~~The BTS doesn't need to be sourced since it is self-sourcing.~~--Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 20:01, September 28, 2011 (UTC)
  - Users are free to source self-sourcing BTS statements if they wish. Either way is OK. Menkooroo 14:17, September 29, 2011 (UTC)
    - Okay.--Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 14:31, September 29, 2011 (UTC)
Jefferson
- ~~Same objections as Celwis below, plus:~~
- Even if the Atlas doesn't specify just who considered them impressive, it might be a good idea to say that the mountain peaks were "considered impressive" rather than the catch-all and potentially POVish "impressive."
  - Changed.
    - Does the Atlas use the wording "impressive?" If so, it's worth including, even if "considered" is added before it. Menkooroo 04:02, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
      - It does. Does that work? MasterFred^(Whatever) 04:27, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
- I think your original BTS wording was better. "Appears in" doesn't quite work for something in the "Sources" section. "Mentioned in" would be fine, or "mentioned and pictured in" if you prefer. Just be sure to never add (Mentioned only) to anything in the "Sources" section, as everything in a "Sources" section is (Mentioned only). Menkooroo 05:32, October 4, 2011 (UTC)
  - Fixed. MasterFred^(Whatever) 15:30, October 4, 2011 (UTC)

Comments An image is on the way. MasterFred^(Whatever) 15:49, September 28, 2011 (UTC)