Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Alchenaut (second nomination)

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Alchenaut
    • 1.1 (3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Alchenaut

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 16:32, June 10, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Bet you haven't seen this one for quite some while.

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:11, June 10, 2019 (UTC)
  2. I have an objection that will add exactly the thirteen words necessary to send this back to the GAN. Fan26 (Talk) 19:01, June 10, 2019 (UTC)
    Thank you, Fan, you are a wonderful human being. Imperators II(Talk) 19:28, June 10, 2019 (UTC)
    yes, I'm aware. :P. Fan26 (Talk) 19:31, June 10, 2019 (UTC)
  3. Zed42 (talk) 04:16, June 11, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:38, June 12, 2019 (UTC)
  5. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 03:50, June 13, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa
  • Can we not assert that this moon is terrestrial? We're shown an illustration of the o'cerry sitting on a solid surface (which presumably is meant to represent Alchenaut itself), so it's obviously meant to be a land-based species.
    • I think you're too fond of your terrestrial planets and moons. :P Added. Imperators II(Talk) 11:29, June 12, 2019 (UTC)
  • I'm not terribly fond of the way the beginning of the Description section is worded, regarding its galactic placements. I'd rather see you group the Expansion Region and the Western Reaches together, such as "within the Expansion Region portion of the Western Reaches." Starting off the sentence with "Expansion Region" and then ending the sentence with "the region known as the Western Reaches" just kind of reads strangely.
    • Amended that. Imperators II(Talk) 11:21, June 12, 2019 (UTC)
  • I feel like reference 4 can do without the preamble. The quotation from Wallace's blog pretty much says everything that needs to be said. You can add links to his quote if you prefer.
    • Personally, I liked it, but I'll defer to your judgment. :P Imperators II(Talk) 11:25, June 12, 2019 (UTC)
  • In the BTS, I don't see where September 2012 is supported by anything in the Online Companion. Is that part really necessary anyways? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:58, June 11, 2019 (UTC)
    • Not needed; removed. Imperators II(Talk) 11:21, June 12, 2019 (UTC)
  • Maybe Archive is just being broken, but the backup link in reference 4 does not work. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:00, June 12, 2019 (UTC)
    • 'twas a matter of a missing slash; fixed. Imperators II(Talk) 11:21, June 12, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

  • Here is the link to the article's latest GA nomination. Imperators II(Talk) 16:41, June 10, 2019 (UTC)