Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Accellerite/Legends

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Accellerite

• Nominated by: Cade Calrayn 17:04, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Project Hero

(4 ECs/0 Users/4 Total)

Support

1. Assuming Winterz' satisfaction. Commander Code-8 ^{G'day, mate} 23:39, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
2. Winterz (talk) 23:41, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
3. 501st dogma^(talk) 22:18, April 8, 2013 (UTC)
4. Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 22:39, April 8, 2013 (UTC)

Object

1. CC-8
   • Can you say which war the Battle of Corellia was in?
     • Not seeing this one changed. Commander Code-8 ^{G'day, mate} 10:44, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
       • Done. Cade Calrayn 15:31, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
   • Say whenever it was that Qui-Gon tracked the bomb on the Aurorient express.
   • Who is the Xenopatholgist? Commander Code-8 ^{G'day, mate} 01:26, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
     • All done. Cade Calrayn 16:43, March 31, 2013 (UTC)

1. Heyo!
   • Mention that the compound was created by Doc and used to cure Nem'ro specifically.
     • What do you mean? I state that he made it to cure a disease.
       • I just thought you could expand and complete it, but if you don't want do so, it's.. okay.
   • Expand the comic part in the Bts section.
     • That's still fluff, Winterz.
       • It's not fluff, you should be explicit that it is the second issue of the comics and so on.
         • Ah, you mean the issue. Done.
   • Conflict of the Battle of Corellia?
     • Done.
   • Give a time reference to Doc's (yes, mention Doc's feat) and Qui-Gon's events. Winterz (talk) 17:04, March 31, 2013 (UTC)
     • Already gave it for Qui-Gon, and done. Cade Calrayn 15:31, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
       • You should organize it chronologically ;). Winterz (talk) 15:39, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
         • Chronology isn't a necessity here, as the article isn't subdivided. I'd agree if it was, but as the article currently stands, I've arranged it according to the uses of the compound. One could go either way, I've just chosen this one. Cade Calrayn 22:53, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
2. 501st
   • Could you make it so it is chronological? 501st dogma^(talk) 00:34, April 8, 2013 (UTC)
     • As I just explained to Winterz above, it's author's choice here, since it's not subsectioned. I simply chose to organize it by the uses of the compound itself instead of history. Cade Calrayn 00:37, April 8, 2013 (UTC)
       • Gah, I didn't even see his comment. Well then, leave it as it is. 22:18, April 8, 2013 (UTC)

Comments