- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
128th Flight (second nomination)
- Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 03:15, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Former CA I just cleaned up. I believe all issues have been fixed.
(2 ECs/4 Users/6 Total)
Support
AnilSerifoglu (talk) 03:20, May 8, 2016 (UTC)- Cwedin(talk) 03:25, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
Imperators II(Talk) 09:59, May 9, 2016 (UTC)- I'd personally recommend un-sectioning it, but will leave the decision up to you. Ayrehead02 (talk) 06:39, June 9, 2016 (UTC)
- <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 03:02, June 23, 2016 (UTC)
- Corellian Premier
The Force will be with you always 01:54, August 10, 2016 (UTC)
Object
Imperators II
The intro and the History section use the definite article with the article's name, while the Characteristics and BTS sections do not; please address this for consistency.Imperators II(Talk) 14:12, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
CP
Issue remains: can't source the release date to the item itself. Corellian Premier
The Force will be with you always 16:23, August 3, 2016 (UTC)
- I've taken care of it. Imperators II(Talk) 17:57, August 9, 2016 (UTC)
Comments
- Not actually sure if this is an objection yet, but why is the article split since it's well under 200 words? It looks odd having such short sections since the contents takes up most of the article. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:15, May 12, 2016 (UTC)
- Honestly, I have no idea. I did wonder about it, but as it achieved status and passed review whilst sectioned, I left it as is. Additionally whilst sectioning is a requirement if it exceeds the limit, it is not a requirement if it is under. Perhaps something for the ECs to discuss, articles UNDER a certain limit should not be sectioned? This particular article sits at 116 words by my count. Manoof (talk) 11:58, May 12, 2016 (UTC)
- EC here. Sectioning may be optional (I think) for smaller articles, but if it is done, it MUST follow the Layout Guide. Corellian PremierThe Force will be with you always 16:23, August 3, 2016 (UTC)
- EC here. Sectioning may be optional (I think) for smaller articles, but if it is done, it MUST follow the Layout Guide. Corellian Premier
- Honestly, I have no idea. I did wonder about it, but as it achieved status and passed review whilst sectioned, I left it as is. Additionally whilst sectioning is a requirement if it exceeds the limit, it is not a requirement if it is under. Perhaps something for the ECs to discuss, articles UNDER a certain limit should not be sectioned? This particular article sits at 116 words by my count. Manoof (talk) 11:58, May 12, 2016 (UTC)