Wookieepedia > Wookieepedia:AgriCorps > AC/Jarell
Jarell
Things to do
- Update needed.
- Updated -- main addition was incorporating the new term "reptiloid" into the article. Appropriate category added as well.
- "Sentient species by location"-type category needed.
- Added.
- Cav, as the expert on all things Kathol sector, surely you can narrow that down to "Kathol sector sentient species" or something like that? Imperators II(Talk) 21:20, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Of course I could. But is it really needed to be that specific? Breaking down species by sectors is not being done anywhere else that I can see. The category is only subdivided into general geographical areas. Why single out one sector at the moment? - Sir Cavalier of One
(Squadron channel) 21:55, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- It's not being done because nobody is the first to do it. There's no reason why categorization shouldn't be specific instead of just lumping 137 articles in one category. Imperators II(Talk) 22:21, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Category created. I am assuming you will be following this example and requesting all species status articles to be following the same guidelines from now on, and will be working to ensure all species are properly catalogued. - Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 23:22, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Category created. I am assuming you will be following this example and requesting all species status articles to be following the same guidelines from now on, and will be working to ensure all species are properly catalogued. - Sir Cavalier of One
- It's not being done because nobody is the first to do it. There's no reason why categorization shouldn't be specific instead of just lumping 137 articles in one category. Imperators II(Talk) 22:21, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Of course I could. But is it really needed to be that specific? Breaking down species by sectors is not being done anywhere else that I can see. The category is only subdivided into general geographical areas. Why single out one sector at the moment? - Sir Cavalier of One
- Cav, as the expert on all things Kathol sector, surely you can narrow that down to "Kathol sector sentient species" or something like that? Imperators II(Talk) 21:20, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Added.
- Date(s) need to be properly referenced.
- Removed direct reference to 292 BBY - original text was "300 years ago." DarkStryder is set in 8 ABY, so I simply counted back 300 years. Removed as speculative, and simply going with "three centuries" and no exact date.
- I think it depends on the exact wording, though. If the work is set in 8 ABY and it says something happened "three centuries ago," I think there's no reason why the date 292 BBY shouldn't be derived from that. Imperators II(Talk) 21:20, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- The CSWE complicates matters and dates the 300 years from the Battle of Endor, meaning there is now a time range that could be from 296 BBY to 292 BBY. Probably best to leave it as it is. - Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 21:55, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, in that case - of course. You can't not love the CSWE. :P Imperators II(Talk) 22:21, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- The CSWE complicates matters and dates the 300 years from the Battle of Endor, meaning there is now a time range that could be from 296 BBY to 292 BBY. Probably best to leave it as it is. - Sir Cavalier of One
- I think it depends on the exact wording, though. If the work is set in 8 ABY and it says something happened "three centuries ago," I think there's no reason why the date 292 BBY shouldn't be derived from that. Imperators II(Talk) 21:20, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Removed direct reference to 292 BBY - original text was "300 years ago." DarkStryder is set in 8 ABY, so I simply counted back 300 years. Removed as speculative, and simply going with "three centuries" and no exact date.
- Extraneous parts of the BTS section that are just reproducing the Sources list in prose should be removed.
- Removed mention of being reference by language in Vision of the Future due to removal story from appearances.
- That objection mostly referred to the mention of the CSWE entry. If the entry added something important to the subject's development, then that info should be added to the BTS. If it doesn't (and, judging by the comment above, I'm assuming it doesn't) the mention of the entry in the BTS is redundant to the Sources list and therefore unnecessary. Imperators II(Talk) 21:20, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Removed the sentence. However, if you consider being identified as "reptiloid" as being important enough to be mentioned in context with the CSWE entry, it can be readded. - Sir Cavalier of One
(Squadron channel) 21:55, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- I, for one, definitely don't. Imperators II(Talk) 22:21, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Removed the sentence. However, if you consider being identified as "reptiloid" as being important enough to be mentioned in context with the CSWE entry, it can be readded. - Sir Cavalier of One
- That objection mostly referred to the mention of the CSWE entry. If the entry added something important to the subject's development, then that info should be added to the BTS. If it doesn't (and, judging by the comment above, I'm assuming it doesn't) the mention of the entry in the BTS is redundant to the Sources list and therefore unnecessary. Imperators II(Talk) 21:20, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Removed mention of being reference by language in Vision of the Future due to removal story from appearances.
- If in the medium listed under Appearances only the language Jarellian is mentioned, that doesn't really count as a mention of the Jarell and should be removed.
- Removed appearances as it only mentions the language "Jarellian."
- The article's text should be broken up into more paragraphs wherever possible.
- Split longer paragraphs into more manageable ones. - Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 17:08, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- I think the body looks good now, but the intro could use some splitting, as well. Imperators II(Talk) 21:20, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Split the intro, although I wish to point out that these paragraphs are really not that long in the grand scheme of things. The intro is four sentences long - which means that each paragraph is now two sentences long. It is just that I like to write complete and wordy sentences.
- Not sure what you mean by the "grand scheme of things," I'm just looking at the paragraphs in Oasis skin and when they look long enough to be potentially discouraging for readers, who mostly use Oasis, I suggest they be split. Imperators II(Talk) 22:21, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- I do not believe a four sentence paragraph to be discouraging. - Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 23:22, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- I do not believe a four sentence paragraph to be discouraging. - Sir Cavalier of One
- Not sure what you mean by the "grand scheme of things," I'm just looking at the paragraphs in Oasis skin and when they look long enough to be potentially discouraging for readers, who mostly use Oasis, I suggest they be split. Imperators II(Talk) 22:21, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Split the intro, although I wish to point out that these paragraphs are really not that long in the grand scheme of things. The intro is four sentences long - which means that each paragraph is now two sentences long. It is just that I like to write complete and wordy sentences.
- I think the body looks good now, but the intro could use some splitting, as well. Imperators II(Talk) 21:20, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Split longer paragraphs into more manageable ones. - Sir Cavalier of One
- BTS should be sourced, as well. Imperators II(Talk) 21:20, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Whatever happened to the notion of the self-sourcing BTS? All of the information you need to check the information is in the sentence. A ref tag basically repeating the information is redundant. - Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 21:55, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Well, I think what happened is that precedent now is to completely source articles, including the BTS. Referencing costs nothing, and it adds an infrastructure in case an article needs to be updated with new info in the future. Imperators II(Talk) 22:21, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- It is now sourced. For the record, I find this completely redundant and unnecessary. - Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 23:22, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- It is now sourced. For the record, I find this completely redundant and unnecessary. - Sir Cavalier of One
- Well, I think what happened is that precedent now is to completely source articles, including the BTS. Referencing costs nothing, and it adds an infrastructure in case an article needs to be updated with new info in the future. Imperators II(Talk) 22:21, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Whatever happened to the notion of the self-sourcing BTS? All of the information you need to check the information is in the sentence. A ref tag basically repeating the information is redundant. - Sir Cavalier of One
- Looking at the article in the Oasis skin, it looks like it could use another image. Maybe one of Oon Tien? Imperators II(Talk) 21:20, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Added. - Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 21:55, October 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Added. - Sir Cavalier of One
Removal of GA status
- Placed on probation at Meeting 97. Imperators II(Talk) 20:56, October 22, 2017 (UTC)
- Status kept at Meeting 98. 1358 (Talk) 00:48, November 26, 2017 (UTC)