Welcome, Tim Auke Kools!Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Please do not remove talk page and forum comments, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! —SFH 19:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC) |
KOTOR 3
Knights of the Old Republic 3 was listed as such because the source that confirmed its existence used the arabic numeral. Please don't move an OOU article without discussing it on the talk page. NaruHina Talk
23:31, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
- It is true that most released Star Wars sequels use the roman numeral. However, because KOTOR3 was not released it is a secial case. We used the title we were given in Rogue Leaders, which used "3" instead, to set the article title. As of now, that is the official title of the project and until another source calls it "III," we have to go by it. NaruHina Talk
06:53, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
Re: Uthar Wynn
If you had read the edit summary, you would have known why your edit was reverted. The article was nominated, and passed, the review process to become an FA. As such it is supposed to be higher quality, and your edits not only lowered the quality, the grammar was very confusing. If you feel that your edit is necessary, maybe you can contact the contributor who originally nominated the article to be an FA, and they might add it in if they feel it would be appropriate. Trip391 (talk) 19:30, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
- Hello there. If I may chime in, you cannot expect people to answer immediately to any of your messages. Most of us are busy doing other things in real life, as you may suspect. That being said, if you want to know the nominator of a status article, just go to its talk page and then click on the "featured article" link that is listed under "Article milestones." Cheers. --Lelal Mekha
(Audience Room) 09:58, July 4, 2014 (UTC)
- Hello again. Well, I did give you the instructions for finding the identity of the nominator in my last message above, didn't I? I even gave you the links in that message. Of course, I could have told you directly that the user you're looking for is Jedi Kasra, but that wouldn't be too pedagogical—and I'm a teacher IRL. If you're going to edit here more often, you'll have to learn how to do things by yourself. (And I assure you there's no hostility whatsoever in what I'm saying here.) Cheers. --Lelal Mekha
(Audience Room) 11:25, July 4, 2014 (UTC)
- Graag gedaan, Tim Auke. ;-) Don't worry about your mastery of the English language. I'm a foreigner myself: I'm a French-speaking Belgian, actually. --Lelal Mekha
(Audience Room) 12:13, July 4, 2014 (UTC)
- Graag gedaan, Tim Auke. ;-) Don't worry about your mastery of the English language. I'm a foreigner myself: I'm a French-speaking Belgian, actually. --Lelal Mekha
- Hello again. Well, I did give you the instructions for finding the identity of the nominator in my last message above, didn't I? I even gave you the links in that message. Of course, I could have told you directly that the user you're looking for is Jedi Kasra, but that wouldn't be too pedagogical—and I'm a teacher IRL. If you're going to edit here more often, you'll have to learn how to do things by yourself. (And I assure you there's no hostility whatsoever in what I'm saying here.) Cheers. --Lelal Mekha
