Welcome, TheBlackDemon1996!Hello, and welcome to Wookieepedia! I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. For an optimal viewing experience, Wookieepedia recommends using the Monobook skin. For help changing your skin preference, see Help:Skin. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! —Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 16:46, October 4, 2016 (UTC) |
Canon/Legends article policy
Making sense of Canon, Legends, and non-Canon
Hi BlackDemon1996,
I have attached a chart of my understanding of the Lucasfilm Story Group's classification of Canon and Legends. Based on what the Story Group said, they regard the six George Lucas movies and Dave Filoni's The Clone Wars as the "immovable objects" of the Star Wars universe. Basically, everything is built around them. There are some unclear areas like LEGO Star Wars. But I hope this chart explains why the six movies and The Clone Wars appear both the Canon and Legends timelines. This is why we at Wookieepedia have separate Canon and Legends versions for articles like Pong Krell. Please note that this is completely unofficial and is basically just my interpretation of their statement. I hope this helps. Andykatib 02:21, October 12, 2016 (UTC)