Talk: SuperSaiyaMan

Welcome, SuperSaiyaMan!

Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Thoseabouttojediwesaluteyou

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! ——Silly Dan (talk) 01:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Darth Culator

  • I was referring to your insulting of SD.net and Mike Wong, neither of whom I have ever interacted with on any level. Second, the material you were adding was inflammatory and unsourced, and deserved to be reverted. I don't agree with the way Culator conducted himself, but A) you were baiting him and B) you were trying to disrupt the site, whether intentional or not, by adding said inflammatory and unsourced content. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 15:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
    • By the time I got the three sources, the topic was already locked. I wasn't trying to bait him nor was I trying to disrupt the site. Everything I put down was true.
      • Post the sources here and I'll take a look at them- give it a second opinion. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 16:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
        • Sure, give me a few minutes to get them up. I'm having trouble finding the exact post on the topic in TF.net. It's somewhere on the Fleet Junkie Thread...

In the board rules of CBR, with 'What is a Canon Source' http://forums.comicbookresources.com/showthread.php?t=175684 Current Star Wars mod ruling on CBR: http://forums.comicbookresources.com/showpost.php?p=3970006&postcount=31

From the HeroChat board FAQ: http://herochat.com/forum/index.php?topic=110894.0 (Note: The ICS: AOTC calcs fall into the same area where the SD.net calcs come from)

Still having a little trouble finding that one post on the Fleet Junkie thread, but there's three out of my four sources. Finally found it. They have their own topic for SD.net calcs and discourage it in any other topics: http://boards.theforce.net/literature/b10003/21527953/p200

  • I can't access all of those sites atm due to a filter, but I will look at them and get back to you. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 17:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
    • I can, though.
      CBR link one lists SD.net as a possible Star Wars resource, but says nothing about its applicability.
      CBR link two says that EU evidence can't generally be introduced to a Star Wars-related debate on that board (which goes against the Lucasfilm canon rules most Star Wars fans follow, but no one's forcing them to go by those rules), but doesn't mention SD.net.
      The HeroChat link says that ICS calculations aren't allowed for whatever reason (again, nothing saying they can't have the users on their board ignore certain bits of EU canon), but they don't mention SD.net either.
      The TFN link only asks people to keep discussions over numbers and calculations on a different thread: the only person asserting that SD.net is wrong is you.
      So, I'm sorry, but you haven't really cited your claims. —Silly Dan (talk) 21:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
      • Those three links above were made because of three SD.net invasions to the board. When asked where they were getting their calculations, they said they got them from the ICS and SD.net. It caused many flamewars.
  • You will need more proof than that, I'm afraid. We still only have your word on the statement you just made. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 21:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Let me dip into one of the threads where the ICS and SD.net calculations were used on Hero Chat. From the "OT: Evidence of a Planetary Shield" topic that Black Omega started on ICT: http://herochat.com/forum/index.php?topic=109240.0

  • So you show us a thread full of closed-minded children rejecting legitimate evidence as a matter of dogma rather than logic. Big deal. You still fail. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 00:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
    • [Redacted by administration]
  • [Redacted by administration]RedemptionRedemptionusersymbolTalk 01:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • [Redacted by administration] Darth Culator (Talk) 01:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Another insult, Culator? Can you lay off the bullying please. And sorry Redemption...this stuff gets kind of heated for me.
      • If you're here because of some sort of dispute with Michael Wong or StarDestroyer.net I'd suggest you find somewhere else. This isn't the place for online feuds. QuentinGeorge 03:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Culator, can you please stop insulting me? And, by the way, I'm not a troll, I just wanted to put some more criticism down onto those articles. So please, stop insulting me. It's rude and mean.

  • And I've told you that we don't put unsourced "criticism" into biography articles. Since your only contributions seems to be those two pages, the troll charge is warranted, imo. QuentinGeorge 21:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)