Talk: MyNz

Archives: 1 2

This is the current state of my talk. For any past topics, see the archives above.

Why are you insisting on JPEG for this images?

I don't understand why you think File:WildKarrde schem.jpg and File:CocoonPod-EGtVV.jpg should be JPEGs. They are linear drawings that would work well as PNG and even better as SVG. I see no logical reason to keep the JPEGs. Will (Talk - contribs) 08:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

  • I changed it because the previous editors including User:Darth Culator had reverted your edits to the pages. Please stop making a big noise about images because it is getting irritating for us. Without images, Wookieepedia would not be the fancy place it is. MyNz 8:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
I never stated that the image should be removed. I want that image to be improved, not removed. There is a difference. Please don't complain just because other complain about me and make personal attacks on my talk page. Will (Talk - contribs) 08:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Your actions at Forum:Violations of Fair Use rules appear to me that you enjoy making a lot of noise over some tiny issues worth not appearing on the screen. I think that Darth Culator was very wrong about insulting you on your user page but I think you should stop doing similar things to us. MyNz 8:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
At Wikipedia, fair use images in templates and user pages is grounds to get a user in major trouble. Here all I see is apathy. I am not trying to do "similar things to" you. In fact, I am trying to keep everyone out of legal trouble. Instead, you could get Wookiepedia shut down. Is that what you and everyone else want? Dumb idea in my book. Will (Talk - contribs) 08:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
  • I am sorry for getting a bit frustrated and agigated. As requested by you, I have removed all Star Wars pictures (which were all fair use images) from my user page. I am so confused because I am torn between my service and duty to Wookieepedia though I am no longer a Star Wars fan and the rules of reality. I am glad that school will start soon because than I feel useful and happy. I also personally think that quite a lot of Wookieepedians are rather arrogant and apathetic as you describe. MyNz 8:56, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Hey man. What's up? Lost your interest in Star Wars? Or just bored of here? Me, I'm looking forward to uni starting as well. --Eyrezer 09:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Nothing will sap one's enthusiasm for a fandom than actively participating in it, it seems. Anyway, what Mr. Pittenger is suggesting is that policies be changed, and it's still up in the air whether or not we are violating fair use guidelines enough that everyone has to take their pictures down. (Even if we did make the change, we'd handle it in your page's case by replacing the images in your userbox templates with text.) Personally, so long as everyone is polite about it, I'm apathetic about the outcome of the debate: I've always been more interested in the quality of article text and organization than images. —Silly Dan (talk) 13:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[Section redacted by administration]

Fact File 128

You should check out the debate at Talk:Near-Hutt. I saw that you have some info on this, unlike the rest of us. Lonnyd 10:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Goodbye

If you have been a friend of me, feel free to leave comments or signatures. Please kindly do not write insults here.—Unsigned comment by MyNz (talk • contribs)

  • You've been a good contributor here: I hope you'll come back at some point (or if you decide not to, that you'll at least enjoy yourself elsewhere on the net.) Cheers, —Silly Dan (talk) 23:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Dang, I didn't even realize you had left. Bummer man, you were always a great contributor in my book. Cull Tremayne 05:47, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

lies

All that stuff is lies. So please take that off! THis is verry insulting! Quinlanfan 02:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

I forgive you. But what happens on other wikis stays on those wikis. You should not bring them here. and if you are refering to the arguement between me and cull, cull was clearly not thinking straight. I am not insulting him, I am just stating the facts. Thanks, Quinlanfan 14:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:

  • Um, no problem. As far as I'm concerned, none of the past issues have really come to my attention, and I've found you to be quite respectful even when we disagree in CT. Atarumaster88 20px (Audience Chamber) 14:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • You might want to check your last post on Quinlanfan's talk page for a bit of incongruity. Atarumaster88 20px (Audience Chamber) 06:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Stuff

· User talk:Quinlanfan‎; 20:19 . . (+918) . . Darth Culator (Talk | contribs) (Deleted items) · (diff) (hist) . . Lava Skiff‎; 20:18 . . (-60) . . Rune Haako (Talk | contribs) 20:03, 27 March 2007 Quinlanfan (Talk | contribs) (Stop!)


· User talk:Quinlanfan‎; 20:19 . . (+918) . . Darth Culator (Talk | contribs) (Deleted items) · ( · (diff) (hist) . . User talk:JMAS‎; 20:03 . . (+165) . . Quinlanfan (Talk | contribs) (Stop!)


AS you can see, he warned me after I talked to JMAS last. He claims that he warned me before. But he warned me 16 minutes after. I acused JMAS for doing that because he was the last one to edit my page after I saw the images last. Culator says that I had more than three pictures. I had THREE. He also claims that I had more than one fannon subpage. I only had one fannon subpage. The other one is an extention of my user page. I don't know why he hates me so much but he does stuff to make me mad. I did not stalk him, He listed that he was on Wikipedia so I looked him up and contacted him from there. He also listed that he had an email address so I emailed him. The reason because I Emailded him and messaged him was because I Did not understand why he blocked me. It says when the block notice comes up that the user who has been blocked can contact the blocker via email. I did. He has some kind of grudge against me but I don't know why. You can see that I did not break any rules. I did not break any rules. Please look at the following address:

http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Special:Recentchanges&limit=500 I would like it if you took your last message off of my talk page since it was untrue. Thanks, Quin

  • Hey, Quin, Newsflash: he did warn you before you posted. Look at the histories. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 14:41, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[Redacted by administration] MyNz 20:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Please do not bash other users, even those who have been disruptive and banned. It only serves to, as the saying goes, feed the trolls. Atarumaster88 20px (Audience Chamber) 04:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
    • [Redacted by administration] Zainal 5:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
      • It's okay, and you're welcome for the help. I may just e-mail his father about these latest developments. Once again, I'd like to point out that responding with insults and labels on Quinlanfan gets us nowhere as opposed to simply pointing his actions to the higher-ups and letting them decide for themselves. Cheers. Atarumaster88 20px (Audience Chamber) 05:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
      • No, not yet. Same to you. Atarumaster88 20px (Audience Chamber) 03:52, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

No problem

Nice to see you around here. I've also been enjoying my week off varsity at the m. --Eyrezer 11:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Your debate style

I thought I'd take a second to make a friendly suggestion regarding some of the comments I've seen you make in Consensus Tracks recently - this one and this one in particular. First of all, we all know that there are lots of things more important than Star Wars and this site, but it's understood that we're not here for those things. Saying things like "I don't like this idea, because it's more important to think about Iraq right now" comes across as incredibly condescending - especially coming from someone a good deal younger than most of us - and it's no way to make a convincing point. Just something to keep in mind. CooperTFN 07:13, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

[Section redacted by administration]

Explorers

Thank you for adding a sourch to my article. You are welcome to put a sourch next to my other articles. Micha

  • Its allright. Please also remember to add a category at the bottom of the page like I had to do for you at Explorer. Also remember to add a time signature like this (01:11 11 July 2007 (UTC) after your signature. Zainal 01:11 11 July 2007 (UTC)

[Section redacted by administration]

Delted userpage

Hey there. That was me that put the user tag on RememberRuusan's userpage. I just wasn't logged in. And I know what the policy is. I also know that it is in the process of changing. I direct your attention to Forum:User_template#Amend_Denial_of_Recogition_policy. Obviously people realize that a user template and nothing else, even page history (since the article was previously deleted), means that the userpage gets off Special:Wantedpages, which is actually less recognition. If you have any thoughts on the subject, feel free to express them there, but whenever an admin gets around to closing that section of the CT, that should be policy from now on since it's 5-0 to amend the current policy. So by the time the ban tag gets removed from his page, it will be appropriate to add {{user}}. Wildyoda 05:01, 26 August 2007 (UTC)