Welcome, Marco 1907!Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. For an optimal viewing experience, Wookieepedia recommends using the Monobook skin. For help changing your skin preference, see Help:Skin. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! —Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:29, November 10, 2013 (UTC) |
Force Rage
Hello, which source states Palpatine used Force Rage in the duel? All additions to Wookieepedia should be properly sourced. Thank you. Supreme Emperor (talk) 13:55, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Screaming doesn't mean he used force rage though. Windu wasn't necessarily better with a lightsaber. Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:10, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
- I've removed the mention of Anakin using force rage constantly, as it appears to be speculation. Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:24, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
Count Dooku electric Judgement
Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. Trip391 (talk) 19:14, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Then you shouldn't have gone ahead and did it anyway, especially not without an official, verifiable source. Trip391 (talk) 19:46, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
Unverified info, again
All additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information will be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Trip391 (talk) 10:58, August 11, 2014 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked from contributing for 1 year for your egregious personal attacks directed at another user from a different account, which is also a violation of our Sockpuppet policy. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:50, April 9, 2017 (UTC)
RE:19 BBY
You need a proper reference explaining all your reasoning behind that change, just like the reference that you replaced for <ref name="Dark Lord 6" />--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:08, April 26, 2020 (UTC)
RE: Speculation
It is indeed speculation to postulate why Maul lost the duel, as it was not stated in the episode, and it does not matter how long the information had been up. The info was based on assumptions of Filoni's statements, not on what the episode it was sourced to presents. RattsT (talk) 14:58, September 27, 2020 (UTC)