Talk: Legoclones

Welcome, Legoclones!

Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

General help

Site policies

Contribution help

Wookiees-Transparent

Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source.

Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~.

For an optimal viewing experience, Wookieepedia recommends using the Monobook skin. For help changing your skin preference, see Help:Skin.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! —IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 01:14, August 9, 2011 (UTC)

You ever go on Brickipedia? Orangegrub 01:15, August 9, 2011 (UTC)Orangegrub

Unverified info

Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. CC7567 (talk) 04:36, September 1, 2011 (UTC)

  • Please heed the above warning. Wookieepedia is not the place for speculation, unverified info, fanon, or anything of the like. Also, please pay attention to the site's image upload policy. Any image that fails to provide proper sourcing will be subject to immediate deletion, and continued offenses—as with any other policy—may result in blocks of appropriate length. Please therefore become more familiar with all of the site's policies before continuing to contribute. Thank you. CC7567 (talk) 04:42, September 8, 2011 (UTC)

Proper protocol

The proper course of action would have been to continue discussing the matter on the talk page for OSM Devilfish rather than arbitrarily moving it again. This is especially the case consider the only source that gives the craft a name calls it by BOTH names. - JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 02:48, September 29, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm new at this stuff. How do you make a talk page for an article? Legoclones 02:51, September 29, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Hawk

There's nothing wrong with having two articles use the same image if it's beneficial to both articles. You'll find that a lot across the site. CC7567 (talk) 00:52, November 22, 2011 (UTC)

  • Please calm down. The image of Hawk is currently the only suitable image for the hawk article. If you have a more appropriate image, you're welcome to add it to the article. CC7567 (talk) 04:25, November 22, 2011 (UTC)

Gunner (Clone Trooper)

Hi, I saw you edited the Gunner (clone trooper) article. I was wondering if you possibly had a UK comics collection. I'm working on a Swamp Monster page and would like to know if you have some pictures. If not, then never mind. --Badinkadink (talk) 17:42, July 20, 2012 (UTC)

  • No, I'm sorry. I don't have those comments. I'm just a big fanatic of clone troopers, which is why I edited it. Sorry. Legoclones (Comlink) 03:15, July 22, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Clones

Rex's birth date should actually be c. 32 BBY, which is sourceable to The Clone Wars film novelization (which takes place in 22 BBY), in which he states that he is ten years old. The majority of the other clone birth dates on the site, including Cody's, are inadequately sourced, as AOTC didn't show that all the clones were decanted in 32 BBY. Too much we don't know, and not enough said by official material. CC7567 (talk) 07:00, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

  • Ok. I didn't know that, but on my wiki, I put them as being born around 32 BBY because if one clone was born 32 BBY, they all cannot be that far apart in age. Also, The Essential Guide to Warfare lists the GAR being founded in 32 BBY, so no clones could have been born any later than 32 BBY. Thanks! Legoclones (Comlink) 21:34, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • I have a full list of evidence right here, if you don't mind reading it.

Re: CT-8910

As the Insider article says "see casualty reports labeled CT-8770 through CT-8910," The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia's entry on CT-8770 and CT-8910 clarifies that there were 141 clone troopers total killed in the crash (of which CT-8770 and CT-8910 were two). Despite the slight inconsistency with the clones from Routine Valor, we don't have the power to override either canon source. All we can do is note the inconsistency in the Bts of articles where relevant. Also, Order 66: Destroy All Jedi doesn't outright state that every single trooper with designation between 8770 and 8910 was part of the 141 killed—that's the implication, of course, but because it doesn't explicitly list those other 139 troopers, they might not necessarily have designations between 8770 and 8910. Just want to point that out as well. CC7567 (talk) 19:55, February 19, 2013 (UTC)

Utapau trooper?

Hi You know a lot about clone troopers so I was wondering if you could add a page on Utapau troopers. It could go here or on Clone Trooper wiki (Yes I read it). There is no site with a page dedicated to those guys. Sorry if I bothered you. -Jep Do Tenko—Unsigned comment by 209.179.88.64 (talk • contribs)

is the helmet like the one on Barlex the phase 2 ARC trooper armor or is it a different thing all together? -Jep Do Tenko

Or phase 2 ARF trooper armor -Jep Do Tenko

Oh uh... this is awkward but I now know he is a paratrooper :\ sorry. Jep Do Tenko

um... you may want to check clone trooper wiki. I think it just shut down all other pages are ok but clone trooper wiki wont come up! -Jep Do Tenko