Talk: Kilson/Archive 1

< User talk:Kilson

Welcome, Kilson!

Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers: right|180px

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! —SFH 00:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC) |}

Gray Jedi

  • Please stop adding Kyle Katarn to the gray Jedi page. If you continue to do so you may be given a ban. Thanks, 20px TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar (It's A Trap!) 14:11, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
    • But Kyle Katarn uses Force Lighting and grip, and he has had several scirts with the dark side. Also, in his article it says he's probably a Gray Jedi.
      • That doesn't make him a Gray Jedi. Plo Koon used force lightning and was a respected member of the Jedi council. Quinlan Vos brushed the dark side several times, yet wasn't a Gray Jedi. And Wookieepedia articles can often be quite inaccurate, so I would rely too much on them for facts. 20px TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar (It's A Trap!) 14:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
        • I know many other users will support my claim that he is a Gray Jedi, we should propably get a few more opinions.
          • That's not really important. We don't decide canon. If you can come up with a source which explicitly states he is a gray jedi, then by all means add it in. 20px TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar (It's A Trap!) 14:31, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Jedi Healers

  • Please stop classifying characters according to what you think they should be. We can only list canonical information. If a book or other official material calls someone a Jedi Healer, then you can add it and indicate the source. Gonk (Gonk!) 17:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
    • OK, but both Tekli and Cilghal was a classified a Jedi Healers in the New Jedi Order series, so that means there Jed Healers, so when they appear in other novels of graphic novels they are appearing as Jedi Healers. They may not be healing but they are still Jedi Healers. The same applies to Barriss Offee, Vima-Da-Boda, Hosk Trey'lis, Stass Allie, and T'ra Saa. You deleted all of the appearences I put down for them.
      • It would be better to just include those appearances in the characters' articles. Listing all those appearances under Jedi Healer would only confuse people and is redundant anyway, since there is a Category:Jedi healers, which is where users will go if they want some examples. Beyond that, the only addition that might be appropriate for the Jedi Healer article is a selective "List of Jedi Healers," and every character appearing there must have a REF tag indicating the source. Gonk (Gonk!) 17:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
        • I agree, a list of Jedi Healers would be good, but I missed an appearance where they say the term Jedi Healer. I'll put that down instead.
  • And don't remove in text messages just to justify putting in those sources. It's vandalism. If you do that again, I will give you a cool down ban. -- SFH 17:49, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Sorry about the test message, I was only putting back the appearances. I didn't mean to get rid of the test message. I would put it back, but I'm still getting used to editing and I don't know how to.

Re: EMP launcher

Probably a grenade launcher. And thanks for the kind words. Gonk (Gonk!) 23:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Your welcome, and thanks, I wasn't really sure.

Separatist species

One request: if you're adding an article to the Category:Separatist-aligned species, could you first make sure that there's information in the article showing that they were part of the CIS? I reverted your edits to the Advozse and Togorian articles, because there's no information in the sources I have which says what they were doing during the Clone Wars. Not that I'm saying your edits are wrong: I suspect that they're right, it's just that their separatist alignment is mentioned in a source I don't have, and that information is not mentioned elsewhere in the article. If you put the categorization back, please add some text to the history section of those articles, mention which source leads you to this information in the edit summary, and add a footnote if possible. Thanks, —Silly Dan (talk) 12:59, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

GA userboxes

Hello. I couldn't help but notice that you have four {{user GA}} userboxes. Looking at the history of the articles, you made little or no edits to two of them (IG-100 MagnaGuard and XJ-2 airspeeder), and while you did do some work to the other two, they were completely re-written by another user. The user GA box is only for users who significantly improved an article (e.g. adding at least several paragraphs of good quality writing). The boxes aren't given to users who made minimals edits to an article, who voted for it on the GAN page, or who had previously done work on it before it was re-written. So, I (and presumably the users who put in all the hard work on the articles) would appreciate if you would remove them accordingly. No hard feelings, -- AdmirableAckbar [Talk] 15:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Per AdmirableAckbar. Also, you added a userbox for the XJ-2 airspeeder, which I just archived today...so, ya. Like AdmirableAckbar explained above, that's how one comes to earn one of those userboxes ;) Greyman(Paratus) 00:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
    • I understand dude. I thought it meant that if you supported for the article while it was nominated you could put the GA user box up. Sorry.

HOB GA

Youu are supposed to put context for everything you write in both the Intro and the Body anyway. I'm currently occupied with Knightfall objections but I will get to rereviewing HOB as soon as possible. NaruHina Talk 14px 00:34, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

  • No problem, I was happy to help. NaruHina Talk 14px 07:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Lok durd

  • Well the pics had redlinks, so I removed them, plain and simple. And I dont have to consult you about it or anything. If there are redlinks I'll remove them.TroybShadowFeed48px 03:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Images

Please, make sure to remove black borders from those two images and re-upload them. Also try to find a bigger version of those images, which shouldn't very hard. Otherwise those images could be deleted as low-quality ones. Mauser 20:39, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Darth Bandon GAN

I believe I've taken care of most of your objections, to the article. Don't know how to upload images to the article, and don't have the necessary equipment.--Jedi Kasra (talk) 15:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Lok Durd

Hey, you're welcome. I was planning on nominating it for a featured article, but as I already put Battle of Ryloth (Clone Wars) up for a FAN, I was planning to wait. (Although, admittedly, the article hasn't been reviewed yet.) I'd prefer if you nominated Lok Durd yourself, and I can try to help out in whatever ways I can, i.e. with answering objections, as long as you don't mind. (Also, I don't think "track records" will garner extra support. It's the article itself and the initiative of the nominator that matters, not who the nominator is, so it shouldn't matter who nominates it.) Also, you can check out The Clone Wars site on StarWars.com to watch the episodes for free (and legally). --CC7567 20px-Rex.png talk 01:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

  • If you'd like me to help out with answering objections for the article, I'm happy to do it. Someone reviewed the article, but I planned to leave it to you, since it's officially your nomination. If you'd like me to help out, though, I'm here; just let me know. --CC7567 20px-Rex.png talk 20:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
    • The thing that concerns me is that I didn't nominate the article for an FA. I just don't want it to seem that it was my nomination instead of yours; I may have contributed to the article, but it's still your nomination. (And I'd prefer not to be a co-nominator for it.) I'd like you to answer the objections if you can. I'm still happy to help out, just not to the point where it seems like I'm the nominator and you're not. Just let me know if you'd like me to do something, and I'm happy to do it. --CC7567 20px-Rex.png talk 23:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
      • Thanks; if I see fit to put in my input, I will. Otherwise, I'll just let you do it, because you're doing fine. Also, if the article is upgraded to an FA, I'd prefer not to use the FA box on my page, because even though I contributed to the article, it's not my nomination. Thanks anyway though; I appreciate the thought. --CC7567 20px-Rex.png talk 00:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

RE: GA noms

Hey, Kilson :). No worries, I wasn't an AC when I reviewed Korriban so that's why I hadn't changed it yet. Good work on Tatooine, I'll re-review Shiv later tonight :-). Grunny (Talk) 01:04, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

  • No problem, Kilson. I'll re-review Shiv soon, and I should be able to get to HOB sometime over the next few days. Grunny (Talk) 00:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
    • Well the article can't pass until you do as it is incomplete, so you need to either look at the entry in a local bookstore or get someone who has it to give you the entry. I would but I'm not at home so I don't have it with me for the next week. And please don't edit my talk page archive, it is no longer active. Leave your comments on my current talk page as it says in the disclaimer at the top of the archive. Grunny (Talk) 05:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Saba Sebatyne FAN

I added the info for Outcast, so the article should be FA worthy now =D --Markrox91 02:10, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Battle of Korriban =

  • Sure, I can take a look a little later when I have time. However, I'm not exactly the most knowledgeable source on the Galactic Civil War, so I can only check things as far as spelling, grammar and general context. --CC7567 20px-Rex.png talk 01:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Battle of Korriban (Galactic Civil War)

GA-Icon
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Battle of Korriban (Galactic Civil War) has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Cylka-talk- 02:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Expanded Universe talk page

Please refrain from using that sort of language, and don't make a personal attack at anyone. If you really are 15 years old, why are you using those words anyhow? Zakor1138 03:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Knightfall

Hey, Kilson, you have an unstruck objection to Operation: Knightfall's GAN from a long time ago (Its #4). I've taken care of it. NaruHina Talk 14px 01:26, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

The block

What the others were doing in that discussion wasn't on topic, so if it were happen again, it would be best to just inform an admin about that. In general, though, we can't do anything about people's personal opinions of any official Star Wars person. Glad you get why attacking them wasn't OK. - Lord Hydronium 02:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Skirmish on Tatooine

Ok, I'll take a look over it soon. Chack Jadson (Talk) 14:44, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Recruitment

Hi there, pie lover. Since you've shown interest in The Clone Wars-related articles (such as nominating Lok Durd for an FA and Shiv and Kite for GAs), would you be interested in joining WookieeProject The Clone Wars? It's a comprehensive effort to get everything introduced in the series straightened out. We'd love to have you as a contributor to the project, so please consider joining. :) —CC7567 20px-Rex.png (talk) 17:50, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Mission to Mos Eisley (Galactic Civil War)

GA-Icon
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Mission to Mos Eisley (Galactic Civil War) has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Cylka-talk- 14:06, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

RE: Hoth nom and image

Hey, Kilson. I'm in the middle of a review right now but I'll take another look at Hoth when I'm done. As for your user image, it doesn't violate the user image policy, and as you can see from our general image policy animated images are discouraged but are allowed. Whether or not it is stupid or annoying is just people's opinion, and since it's your user page it's completely up to you. Hope that helps :-). Grunny (Talk) 05:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

HOB-147

GA-Icon
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
HOB-147 has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Cylka-talk- 01:46, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Request

Please don't alter existing statements on the GAN page. Graestan(Talk) 19:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Hoth

I'll review it shortly. Chack Jadson (Talk) 21:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Shiv (clone)

GA-Icon
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Shiv (clone) has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Cylka-talk- 02:50, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Combined Clans Center Building

Hey Kilson, finally found some time to work and did a major expansion of the article. I hope this addresses your GAN objections! —Xwing328(Talk) 01:36, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

  • Whoops, didn't see that one. Should be good now. —Xwing328(Talk) 01:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


Francis

GA-Icon
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Francis has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Cylka-talk- 01:34, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Hoth (comic)

GA-Icon
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Hoth (comic) has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Chack Jadson (Talk) 22:44, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

RFB

Kilson, I have to thank you for your support of me in my election. Pumpkin pie, dutch apple pie, strawberry rhubarb pie, and lemon meringue pie don't hold a candle to the PIE that is Kilson's confidence in me. Still delicious, nonetheless. I'm glad we're working together now, and just as I've offered my assistance as an AC, I'd like to offer it as an administrator and bureaucrat, as well. If there's anything you need, just say the word. Graestan(Talk) 18:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

TCW

I do whatch it quite often ;)Zhao Zhang Tong 03:13, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

One month already

Hello to all the members of WookieeProject: The Clone Wars! Considering the project has just been launched, we've had a great first month, taking three articles to FA status and five articles to GA status. I would like to remind you to please try to do whatever you can to help out; there are still many potential articles that can be taken up as projects, and many of you are already working very hard on them. In the next month, we have a goal to double (if not multiply even more) our current FAs and GAs, because once Season Two starts airing, there will be a ton of more articles that will require attention, and it's best if we get as many as we can out of the way now. Thank you for contributing! Your project head, CC7567 (talk) 20:19, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

RE: Kite

Hey Kilson. I already supported Kite on the 13th :-). Grunny (Talk) 08:35, 23 May 2009 (UTC)