Welcome, Girlbossk!
|
Hello, Girlbossk, and welcome to Wookieepedia! We hope you like the place and choose to join us in building the best Star Wars encyclopedia there is. Here are some things you should know:
New to wikis? Don't worry, we were all new once. Our welcome page has everything you need to get started, and the Jundland Wastes sandbox can be used for test edits. Don't be afraid to make mistakes—be bold! I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, you can consult our FAQ, ask a question in the Senate Hall forum, visit our official Discord server, or leave me a message on my talk page. |
Duplicate article
Hey there, Girlbossk! Welcome to Wookieepedia! I just want to let you know for future reference to double-check if an article you're interested in creating existed prior or not. For example, earlier you created an article titled Unidentified Zabrak Pirate, even though an article of the same subject already existed under Unidentified Zabrak pirate. Speaking of this instance specifically, I've merged all the important additions you made in the former article into the latter. If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me or join Wook's Discord server. Happy editing and cheers! Bonzane10
06:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Darko Macan Tuckerization
Hey there! Just wanna reach out to ask if you have any source confirming that Dacna and Morka are tuckerizations of Darko Macan. Happy editing and cheers! Bonzane10
18:59, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- Hi! I didn't have a direct source confirming this, but I saw on the tuckerization page there were other examples without direct references. Totally understand if you want me to reverse the changes, though I do think it is a pretty intentional reference to Macan given the Dubravan species connection. Alternatively I guess I could reach out to the comic writer, but I'm not sure how I'd go about that. Girlbossk (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for responding! Yeah, unfortunately the tuckerization article is an older one that doesn't get enough care nowadays, especially for today's standard. So I'd definitely be wary of taking anything on there at face value. Unless a source provides any confirmation, there's always a non-zero chance that they're just coincidences, hence why it's preferable to avoid assumptions until further development. Thank you again and cheers! Bonzane10
03:16, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
