Talk: EoGuy99

Welcome, EoGuy99! Hello, and welcome to Wookieepedia! I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers: General help A Wookieepedia Tutorial Wookieepedia FAQ Site policies What Wookieepedia is not User page policy User image policy Signature policy Voting policy Privacy policy Multiple account policy Talk page policy Other policies and guidelines Contribution help How to edit a page Sandbox for practicing editing Be bold in updating pages Manual of Style Layout Guide Sourcing Attribution Neutral point of view Guide to image use Things to do Glossary of common terms used on Wookieepedia Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. For an optimal viewing experience, Wookieepedia recommends using the Monobook skin. For help changing your skin preference, see Help:Skin. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! —Cwedin(talk) 04:35, January 26, 2018 (UTC)

This makes two. EoGuy99 (talk) 23:24, November 11, 2017 (UTC)

Hello again

I'd just like to state this again. Using "awhile" rather than "a while" is perfectly acceptable, and quotes should reflect the spelling used in their sources. - Cwedin^(talk) 04:35, January 26, 2018 (UTC)

• In the case of Fenn Booda, that comic absolutely uses "awhile." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 04:45, January 26, 2018 (UTC)
• My two cents: Quotes used in articles should reflect the actual publication in which they appear, regardless of what Dictionary.com says. If the source has a typo, the quote should use [sic]. I could be in the wrong here, but, at least for promoted articles, you should bring it up on the talk page before making changes. - Cwedin^(talk) 04:46, January 26, 2018 (UTC)

Spelling corrections

Hello. This is a general warning to you to please be mindful of what spelling corrections you're making to articles. In this case, the original source spelled the word like that, so it should not have been changed. There are other, similar cases across other articles, as has been pointed out to you already. Mindlessly going through and fixing what appear to be spelling mistakes can actually be detrimental to our articles. If you can't be trusted to take the time to actually look at what you're fixing, we may have to cut you off. Please don't let it come to that. Thank you for your cooperation. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:17, February 10, 2018 (UTC)

• Since you've apparently decided to not read or otherwise disregard the prior notice, please consider this your official warning. If you continue to do this, you will be blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:36, February 10, 2018 (UTC)

Publisher's summaries

If a publisher's summary or quote uses "cannot," then it shouldn't be changed to "can't." - Cwedin^(talk) 00:24, January 13, 2019 (UTC)