Talk: MoreSources

Back to template

This template is a good idea, but it looks exactly like a stub. We should probably change it. --Azizlight 11:42, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

  • I think maybe we should go back to a smaller, stubbier look. This tag is far too obtrusive for the minimal "objection" it makes, and looks too much like the sources tag. jSarek 04:44, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
    • How about this:
Lott Dodd thumb This article needs to be provided with more sources and/or appearances to conform to a higher standard of article quality.

–SentryTalk 04:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Much better. Maybe with a very small picture of the good Senator, though? —Silly Dan (talk) 04:11, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
    • How about that?–SentryTalk 04:19, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
      • Very nice. -LtNOWIS 00:42, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
        • The one here looks fine, but the actual one seems to be off-center. jSarek 21:54, 22 November 2006 (UTC)