Quote
I changed the quote from "Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future", to "Difficult to see...always in motion, the Future is". According to the discussion at Talk:Force Vision, Difficult to see...always in motion, the Future is is the correct quote.70.17.139.170 20:31, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- That's incorrect. I have replied on the other talk page. -- Ozzel 21:11, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Doesn't Yoda always use Object-Subject-Verb format? I'll have to watch the movie again and listen.Nebulon B freak 21:15, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yoda doesn't follow any set pattern. The quote is correct, and exactly as spoken by Yoda in The Empire Strikes Back/ - JMAS Hey, it's me! 21:16, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yoda/Legends#Personality_and_traits have a look there and notice the part that is in bold, u may notice an explanation of how he talks. Though I do consider it possible this quote is an example of either an actor's flub or an isolated peculiarity.Nebulon B freak 21:37, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- I just looked at an online copy of the film script, it is what Ozzel said, but it is definitely different than how Yoda normally talks.Nebulon B freak 21:48, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yoda doesn't follow any set pattern. The quote is correct, and exactly as spoken by Yoda in The Empire Strikes Back/ - JMAS Hey, it's me! 21:16, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Doesn't Yoda always use Object-Subject-Verb format? I'll have to watch the movie again and listen.Nebulon B freak 21:15, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Update
The current version of this page appears to be designed only with Monobook in mind. If you look at the template in the Wikia skin, you will see that it doesn't look so great. Its height is pretty high, because the template contains an unnecessary amount of text. As a result, it pushes the content down on the page further than it needs to be. This is seen by anyone who doesn't have an account, and Wookieepedia has millions of weekly views from people who don't have accounts.
I would like to propose that this template be revamped to the following:
It cuts down on the unnecessary text (there were two references to speculation, for example, and Wookieepedia doesn't speculate) and reduces the size to a far more manageable level. Thoughts? - Brandon Rhea(talk) 07:06, September 30, 2014 (UTC)
vandalism reversion needed
Back in March, Toprawa and Ralltiir reverted two vandalistic edits but left a third in place, then protected the page so most other editors can't revert it. Would an admin please fix it? Thank you. Asithol (talk) 05:47, August 23, 2018 (UTC)
- Careful you don't mistake vandalism for a well-intentioned, if misguided contribution. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:25, August 24, 2018 (UTC)
- You're right; this probably isn't a case of actual vandalism, considering the discussion right up top of this talk page. Anyway, whatever that editor's motive, thanks for correcting it. Asithol (talk) 02:21, August 24, 2018 (UTC)
- Glad to help. Feel free to message me directly next time you catch something. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:29, August 24, 2018 (UTC)
- You're right; this probably isn't a case of actual vandalism, considering the discussion right up top of this talk page. Anyway, whatever that editor's motive, thanks for correcting it. Asithol (talk) 02:21, August 24, 2018 (UTC)
Group of short stories
Could someone update the template to add "group of short stories" to the available parameters? Since short fiction series seem to be coming out more frequently (e.g. Star Wars: The High Republic: Starlight and "Galactic Tales"), I think it would be handy to have. SilverSunbird (talk) 19:20, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
