Credits from Wikipedia
* (cur) (last) 00:14, 20 Mar 2005 Marudubshinki (detail about atris) * (cur) (last) 22:58, 18 Mar 2005 Stardestroyer (More details, sp, grammar.) * (cur) (last) 17:12, 13 Mar 2005 SimonP m (moving swwiki to talk page) * (cur) (last) 04:11, 12 Mar 2005 Cbarbry (Please help move more articles to the Star Wars Wiki) * (cur) (last) 08:38, 1 Mar 2005 Ahoerstemeier m (Reverted edits by 62.253.219.130 to last version by 67.171.180.209) * (cur) (last) 08:36, 1 Mar 2005 62.253.219.130 * (cur) (last) 21:50, 11 Feb 2005 67.171.180.209 * (cur) (last) 04:32, 30 Jan 2005 AlexTheMartian m * (cur) (last) 17:33, 22 Jan 2005 24.184.102.186 * (cur) (last) 16:05, 2 Jan 2005 68.35.53.173 (KOTORII is the sequel to KOTOR, and the usage of prequel is incorrect) * (cur) (last) 16:04, 19 Dec 2004 SilasM m * (cur) (last) 11:46, 8 Nov 2004 Luis Dantas m (Added disambig note) * (cur) (last) 17:23, 30 Aug 2004 Kevyn m (Fixed link to Carth Onasi) * (cur) (last) 21:40, 27 Aug 2004 QuentinGeorge (added jedi apprentice info) * (cur) (last) 13:31, 27 Aug 2004 Thunderbrand * (cur) (last) 13:31, 27 Aug 2004 Thunderbrand * (cur) (last) 13:18, 27 Aug 2004 Thunderbrand * (cur) (last) 12:53, 26 Aug 2004 Thunderbrand * (cur) (last) 14:28, 24 Aug 2004 Thunderbrand * (cur) (last) 14:24, 24 Aug 2004 Thunderbrand * (cur) (last) 13:09, 24 Jul 2004 Infrogmation (redirect) * (cur) (last) 12:41, 24 Jul 2004 128.233.146.158
Title
- Keeping with our policy of facts-over-common-name (see An'ya Kuro), shouldn't this be at Telos 4 instead of Telos? MarcK 02:37, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Images
I insist that the landscape image should be in the infobox and the planet image should be in the text. This is because infobox images look best when 300px wide, and if we make the planet image 300px wide, it will look way too big and distract the reader. - Sikon [Talk] 05:48, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, but we should first see the planet from space and then get to the surface. --Master Starkeiller 07:32, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Talos 4
Star Trek reference- should we link to Talos IV instead of the regular Wiki?
Surely it's a Doctor Who reference, not Star Trek? 31.52.85.206 21:21, October 16, 2015 (UTC)
S-canon
The info from the Imperial Era Marvel SW is S-canon, not C. Which means that unless some other source has canonized that particular comic, that stuff didn't happen and should be cut from the article. Has it been canonized? DarthMRN 07:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
In use
I'm going to be editing this page in order to keep this article from losing its GA status. I've added the {{Inuse}} template. Cylka-talk- 22:35, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Revan's Disapproval
I believe that if we consider the HK Manufacturing Plant as cannon then this my have been the reason why Revan disapproved of Telos IV's bombardment by Malek and Karath. JMasterWor (talk) 17:02, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
Meetra Surik
Shouldn't Meetra Surik's dealings on Telos IV have an article, it was an event that occurred during the Dark Wars. I think it should be between Skirmish at Peragus II and Mission to Nar Shadda. Just a suggestion. Matt Seay (talk) 01:04, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
Separatist Space
I'm not sure on my edit, does it make a world to be located in Separatist space during the Clone Wars to be automatically a member of the CIS?--71.80.172.90 03:51, September 25, 2012 (UTC)
- You're referring to the Atlas map, I presume? If the star system—that's what's being marked, not the planet—that contains the planet was marked on the map, we take that as confirmation that the planet was part of the CIS. If the planet was merely within the territory lines and its system was unmarked, we feel it is significant to say that it was within the territory, but its loyalty to the CIS is unconfirmed. NaruHina Talk
22:26, September 25, 2012 (UTC) - Oh yes, I was refering to The Clone Wars map found in the astrography section of the CIS article—not sure if it's in the Essential Atlas. So from what your saying, if a system is marked in Separatist space, including the planets, then its was aligned with the Separatists, including Telos IV since it was marked on the map, and this is vice versa with the Republic too I assume.--71.80.172.90 00:23, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if I'm asking too much, but I have 1 more question. I was confused with some of the worlds and there affiliation like: Fondor, Uba IV, and Riflor are shown in Republic space—but aren't they Separatist worlds; while Ord Cestus, Wroona, Gyndine, Chalacta, Sneeve, Columex, etc. are shown in Separatist space?--71.80.172.90 00:42, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
- If they were shown as not a Separatist or Republic world in another source, do not add that they were part of either organization based on the map. You can note that they were within a territory, but do not add that they supported an organization. You can note discrepancies in the "Behind the scenes" section. NaruHina Talk 04:54, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
- If they were shown as not a Separatist or Republic world in another source, do not add that they were part of either organization based on the map. You can note that they were within a territory, but do not add that they supported an organization. You can note discrepancies in the "Behind the scenes" section. NaruHina Talk
- I was noticing your comments regarding the map: so where in the Atlas does it mention about systems marked on the map being loyal to either the Republic or the Separatists--Darth Pythonis (talk) 01:25, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Oh ok, but isn't there something in the Atlas that confirms this explanation—regarding the map--Darth Pythonis (talk) 02:02, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
