Talk: Sunrider naming controversy

Back to page
Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Sunrider naming controversy."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

GA-Former

Sunrider naming controversy is a former Good article. Please see this article's entry on the AgriCorps page for the reasons it was removed.

Article milestones
Date Process Result
July 27, 2010 Good article nomination Success
August 3, 2010 Good article by Menkooro
July 31, 2019 Good article review Removed
August 27, 2019 Former Good article
September 3, 2019 Article has undergone Trash compactor Merge with Sunrider family and delete redirect
Current status: Article merged after Trash compactor
Wptotjtalk

Sunrider naming controversy is within the scope of WookieeProject Tales of the Jedi.

WookieeProject Tales of the Jedi is an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles with topics originating in the Tales of the Jedi saga.

If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Missing a Death Star Here

Why exactly is the name "Sunrider" controversial? Where else has it appeared? -MPK 02:20, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Heh. Apparently it's so controvertial, we can't even mention it in an article about the controversy. The likely troublemaker was Sunrider International, but Jeep is another possibility. Enochf 07:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
    • I just read that and was wondering the same thing. Are there any sites or interviews or something that actually explain it? I thought it meant that DH comics was the one that won't let anyone use the name... Philby 15:20, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

It really is necessary to find who the other party is, both to create a more accurate title and to present the reasons for this being an actual issue. Forcestorm X 04:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

  • What's going on here? Is this a case of the wiki not being allowed to mention the name of the other participant in the lawsuit or is it a case of nobody knowing who the other participant was? Either way, the article should be rephrased to explicitly explain what the problem is! As it is, it's a vague and rather useless article. "Uh, there was some problem here, it may have been kinda resolve and they can maybe mention the name, or maybe not." It really needs more. --The Mess 20:15, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
      • I find it interesting to see more than one product and company with the name sunrider if I google it. So can it really be such a big issue? Has the other party lawsuits against all of them?--TeakHoken91.33.22.231 17:16, December 18, 2009 (UTC)