Talk: Star Dreadnought Command Prototype

Back to page
Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Star Dreadnought Command Prototype."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

CA-Icon

Star Dreadnought Command Prototype has been listed as a Comprehensive article, which means it has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wookieepedia community. If you see a way this page can be updated or improved in line with Wookieepedia's policies, please feel free to contribute.

Article milestones
Date Process Result
September 9, 2019 Comprehensive article nomination Success
September 13, 2019 Comprehensive article by Tommy-Macaroni
Current status: Comprehensive article
ImperiusUnitadaoberTotallex

"We do not require glory, only status articles for our Emperor."

Star Dreadnought Command Prototype is within the scope of WookieeProject Ambition, an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles relating to the Galactic Empire.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can find out more about our mission, or even join yourself!

FantasyFlightGamesLogo

"Let our status articles take flight."

Star Dreadnought Command Prototype is within the scope of WookieeProject Fantasy Flight Games, an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles relating to Fantasy Flight Games.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can find out more about our mission, or even join yourself! Many articles within the project's scope are affected by Wookieepedia's Fantasy Flight Games policy, which was enacted via community consensus. Relevant discussion can be found here and here. Editors are expected to adhere to consensus.

Canon

I was under the impression that the only things in FFG that we are treating as canon are vehicles and characters originating from other canon material. As the Executor-class is in both canon and legends, this should be a legends page, like the cards from that Imperial- and Victory-class expansions. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 07:35, August 4, 2018 (UTC)

  • Actually, the article's image appears to be the Reaper (Executor-class). Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 07:37, August 4, 2018 (UTC)
    • Agreed, this belongs to the Legends article. And I think you're right that's the Reaper--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:48, August 4, 2018 (UTC)
      • Wasn't aware of that, definitely make the switch then--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:29, August 4, 2018 (UTC)
        • Just made the switch, but should we merge this with the Reaper article or place this as the Reaper's model?--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:32, August 4, 2018 (UTC)
          • It is the same image used to depict the Reaper. But FFG has altered the image, so it is not intended to be the Reaper in this image. - 17:56, August 4, 2018 (UTC)
            • Other than Director Krennic being a card in the same set, is there any evidence that the Star Dreadnought Command Prototype is meant to be canon instead of Legends? Weedle McHairybug (talk) 18:01, August 4, 2018 (UTC)
              • I don't think the entire list of cards has been revealed yet so we'll have to wait and see--Vitus InfinitusTalk 19:01, August 4, 2018 (UTC)