Talk: Sith Civil War/Archive1

Back to page |
< Talk:Sith Civil War

This page is an archive of the discussion of an article. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's current talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

Civil War

  • As many of you know i really dont agree with this being classed as a Sith Civil War, however i'll go with the consensus. But can we really call this a Sith Civil War. I mean for one it was a conflict between a Jedi Knight (albeit Exiled) and the Sith, not between a Sith and a Sith (unless canon states the Exile to join the darkside). I mean the first Sith Civil War that took place after the events of KOTOR is obviously a Civil War. But is this? I'm not asking to get rid of the article, just rename it. Any thoughts or ideas? Jasca Ducato 09:32, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
    • To bring on my stubborn streak. I take it that if nobody responds to my message then that means everyone agrees with me moving the article to another name. Not sure what yet though. Jasca Ducato 20:04, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
      • I have to agree. In fact, I have no idea what event this article is actually supposed to be documenting. According to the discussion at Talk:Sith_Civil_War, the Second Sith Civil War took place after the events of KotOR:TSL. –SentryTalk 21:49, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
        • Then as far as we can tell, the Second Sith Civil War was fought out between the remenant's of the Triumvirate's Sith (those that followed the big three). Possibly between the Unidentified Sith Lord (Post–Sith Civil War)|Unknown Darth and someone else. Should the article be re-written as such? Darth Abeonis Sith Council (Sith Campaign) 08:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
          • Yeah, it looks like it needs a rewrite. At least some of the info can be merged into the First Jedi Purge article… –SentryTalk 08:51, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
            • OK, i'll get to work. Darth Abeonis Sith Council (Sith Campaign) 08:57, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
              • Done. But i also think we should creat another article, say the Destruction of the Sith Triumvirate to chronicle the envents of KOTOR:TSL. Darth Abeonis Sith Council (Sith Campaign) 09:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
                • I think that most of the events of KotOR:TSL can be included in the First Jedi Purge article. I just started working on that article, but it has a loooong way to go yet.–SentryTalk 09:32, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Destruction of Malachor

Since people insist on removing it, what's the source for this beginning with the destruction of Malachor V? -- I need a name (Complain here) 15:07, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

There is no such documentation that it is truely destroyed or if Malachor started the "Second Sith Civil War". If anything the Battle of Telos started the "Second Sith Civil War". I simply want it removed, and put it into a fanon section, or put in as one of the possible endings of Kotor II. Until we have proof of it's destruction the destruction of the the Trayus Academy and Malachor cannot be confirmed. - --Nichtganz 15:32, 22 August 2007 (UTC)Nichtganz

That is a shitty excuse, Wait for Kotor III. --Nichtganz 15:38, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Canon is not a "shitty excuse". If anything, your refusal to believe that the destruction of Malachor V isn't canon is a shitty excuse. And FYI, there isn't going to be a KotOR III. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 15:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

i consider the dark side ending canon, what the fuck is your point? And how are you so sure stop making stupid accusations. --Nichtganz 15:43, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

can you qoute anything from it? Or do i have to go on your word? Because if im leaning on just word im walking on crumbling soil. --Nichtganz 15:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

  • The Jedi Exile was variously described as a "heroine" in the articles on the droids that were portrayed in the games. And yes, the Jedi Exile is female. For your own sake, don't start complaining about the gender. -- SFH 16:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

The Gender with the Exile has nothing to do with Malachor. --Nichtganz 16:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

  • No, but it does indicate that the Jedi Exile followed the light side options, which means Malachor was destroyed. -- SFH 16:53, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
    • "stop making stupid accusations". Look who's talking. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20px 17:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Oh for Godsakes people...look up G0-T0 in that damn book. I believe it states that HK-47 with the help of the HK-50 units, destroyed G0-T0 which allowed for Bao-Dur's remote to activate the Mass Shadow Generator which destroys Malachor V (or something to that effect). Could have saved you a few minutes by not bringing up the Exile. --Redemption20pxTalk 17:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Found a discussion thread elsewhere about the book, said it was not canon however i don't care i reverted the page back to it's original status. --Nichtganz 18:04, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Discussion threads aren't canon themselves. Malachor V was destroyed. Get over it. --Redemption20pxTalk 18:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

You are acting rather immature i was debating fact from fan fiction, i really dont like those books, full of errors. I'll accept the fact that malachor was destroyed for the time being. --Nichtganz 18:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Indeed. They are quite inaccurate...but only because they contradict. This isn't contradicting anything. It's canonizing one path in a game in which there are multiple paths to take. --Redemption20pxTalk 18:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)