Talk: Onager-class Star Destroyer

This is the talk page for the article "Onager-class Star Destroyer." This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Onager-class Star Destroyer is a Featured article, which means it has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wookieepedia community. If you see a way this page can be updated or improved in line with Wookieepedia's policies, please feel free to contribute.

"We do not require glory, only status articles for our Emperor." Onager-class Star Destroyer is within the scope of WookieeProject Ambition, an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles relating to the Galactic Empire. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can find out more about our mission, or even join yourself!

"Let our status articles take flight." Onager-class Star Destroyer is within the scope of WookieeProject Fantasy Flight Games, an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles relating to Fantasy Flight Games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can find out more about our mission, or even join yourself! Many articles within the project's scope are affected by Wookieepedia's Fantasy Flight Games policy, which was enacted via community consensus. Relevant discussion can be found here and here. Editors are expected to adhere to consensus.

Siege Dreadnaught

Could it be interpreted that the FO ship in question is the Mandator IV-class Siege Dreadnought? - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 04:07, January 6, 2018 (UTC)

• No I don't think so. There's an image that accompanies the ship and it looks very different. Pause on 5:09 in this video--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:08, January 6, 2018 (UTC)
  • From what I was able to barely read, technology from this ship was passed down to the First Order but it's hard to read.--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:09, January 6, 2018 (UTC)
    • I may have completely misunderstood the question. Do you mean that the technologies of this ship were passed down to the Mandator IV?--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:12, January 6, 2018 (UTC)
      • Yeah, that’s what I was getting at, due to their ground-targeting focus and similar classifications. - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 06:36, January 6, 2018 (UTC)
        • Sorry about that, I think it is but I haven't seen it stated that it was the Mandator IV--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 07:04, January 6, 2018 (UTC)

Class

Vitus, how do we know this is a class and not a classification? Tommy Macaroni 17:40, July 26, 2018 (UTC)

• I came to that conclusion because it's an alleged type of portable cannon.--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 23:44, July 27, 2018 (UTC)
  • That doesn't automatically make it a class. A Star Dreadnought is a sub-classification of capital ship and dreadnought, and yet it isn't a class. I'd say "Siege Breaker" sounds much more like a type of classification rather than a nickname for a class, rather like blockade runner (even though that isn't a class, but more of a term). Either way, I think it would be best if the infobox was removed to avoid assumption. Tommy Macaroni 19:37, July 28, 2018 (UTC)
    • Very well, removed infobox and fixed up article a bit. Hopefully we'll know more about this in the near future.--Vitus Infinitus^Talk 00:04, July 29, 2018 (UTC)
      • Thanks. Yeah I hope so too, I love the design of it. Tommy Macaroni 08:16, July 29, 2018 (UTC)

Does it have a Superlaser?

Is this thing just a ship with a laser? I'm very confused... Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 15:26, December 6, 2018 (UTC)User:SupremeCommanderRaxus

Design is extremely similar to a ship from Wing Commander

The Midway-class heavy carrier, to be specific. Should this be mentioned in the "Behind the Scenes" section?--Valiran (talk) 18:26, May 10, 2020 (UTC)

• A hammerhead design isn't really unique, I think this is far more likely a coincidence than any sort of pastiche or homage to that design. Tommy-Macaroni 18:32, May 10, 2020 (UTC)
  • A hammerhead with a nearly-identical split down the middle? Possibly a coincidence, but I still think there's a connection. Guess we'll have to wait for a response from official sources to be sure.--Valiran (talk) 05:35, May 20, 2020 (UTC)