Magic Dragon
WhiteBoy wrote in his edit summaries of the primary article, "Can someone verify? I don't have this book. I'm assuming this is legit. If not, it's speculation, hasn't been approved by Lucasfilm, and doesn't belong as part of the article. Thanks!" followed by "heh...recognized the picture and found the article in Star Wars Insider #66. No mention of Magic Dragon in the article that I found."
Yes, the information is speculation. However, it's speculation on the part of the author, who, given the opportunity, is likely to revisit these names in future works. It's also an italicized note, indicating it's an aside from the primary text of the article. I think providing this information is appropriate, so long as it's clear that it's currently unofficial (and my revision of the note should make that more clear). If people disagree with this, it should be noted that Martio Batch and Nial Declann have similar notes that may also need editing. --jSarek 18:33, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info and especially for quoting the source. Personally, I would still rather wait until it became official. Otherwise we could have tons of "unofficial" info thrown into articles and that would get really messy really quick. If we keep it, I think it should be in a "trivia" section like we have in some other articles. I will go ahead and add the trivia section, but not edit again until we get some more discussion and see what others think. Thanks again! --WhiteBoy 18:45, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, using a differentiating header is a good idea, something I should have thought of. However, I think Behind the Scenes is more appropriate, as it clearly indicates that the information is out-of-universe. --jSarek 21:21, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Good idea. I like it. --WhiteBoy 03:16, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, using a differentiating header is a good idea, something I should have thought of. However, I think Behind the Scenes is more appropriate, as it clearly indicates that the information is out-of-universe. --jSarek 21:21, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Wrong picture
That wasn't Takel being zapped by Trioculus; he's the mustashed man seen dining with the Moffs in the next chapter. TalonCard 03:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Who is it, then? Takel was the only Grand Admrial at the Kessel Convocation, and that person is identified in the text as a Grand Admiral. jSarek 07:33, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
